My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58865
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58865
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:09 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:03:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/6/2002
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DMG
To
GCC Rio Grande Inc.
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.4.4 EXHIBIT D - Mining Plan <br />(a) The description of the method of mining in each stage of the operation as <br />related to any surface disturbance on affected lands. <br />The narrative is presented in sufficient detail in the pemut application to provide a visual <br />representation of the mining method. However, this should be correlated to an expanded <br />map of the active mining area that clearly illustrates the features described in the <br />narrative. For example, the locations of the overburden and topsoil stockpiles should be <br />clearly shown on this map along with the locations of the sediment pond, the diversion <br />ditches, etc. Furthermore, this map should represent the worst case disturbance for <br />assistance in prepazing the reclamation liability estimate. This may include from 5-10 <br />years of mining disturbance and reclamation illustrating the vazious phases from freshly <br />stripped to fully reclaimed. From initial seeding until a phase is vegetated with aself- <br />sustaining cover could easily take 5 yeazs and at least some portion of the financial <br />warranty is required until it reaches this state in development. <br />The location of the initial and active overburden and topsoil stockpiles aze important for <br />calculation of the reclamation bond as well as determining the final disposition of these <br />piles. Also, if this material is to remain in a stockpile for more than one growing season, <br />it must be seeded with a temporary seed mix to protect it from erosion. Please provide a <br />seed mix that will be appropriate for this use. <br />(b) Earthmoving <br />No comment at this time. <br />(c) All water diversions and impoundments. <br />This item requires further clarification. If the diversion and impoundment structures <br />described in the permit application aze to be constructed and the water utilized for dust <br />control, this will likely require that augmentation water be acquired from the State <br />Engineer's office during mining. In addition, the design specifications for any <br />containrnent structure, including storm event sizing, dischazge stmcture size and location, <br />must be submitted along with general design specifications for diversion structures. <br />Furthermore, the entire surface water control plan should be included on the mine plan <br />map and/or the expanded 10 yeaz map to show how surface water run-off will be <br />managed to protect against pollution both during and after mining. <br />Upon final reclamation, there is a concern about how the pond will be passively <br />dischazged and the watershed will be restored. During mining the pond can be <br />dischazged through pumping as stated in the application, however, once mining is <br />completed, how will the surface water run-off be allowed to flow unimpeded back into <br />the St. Charles River? It presently appears that a permanent impoundment will be formed <br />due to the elevation loss on the north end of the pit as the result of resource extraction. In <br />other words, once 30 feet of limestone is removed and the first highwall is backfilled at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.