PERMFILE57236 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. J.R. Owen Charles Lane Pit - File Plo. M-84-183 Exhibits B and E -5- December 7. 1984 1. Is the adjacent draw a flowing drainage, or is it ephemeral? In either case, how is this drainage to be protected from sediment due to the mining operation? 2. How is erosion downslope into the draw to be prevented in final reclamation? Bob Ashton Pit - File No. M-84-184 Exhibit D 1. If nothing but the dry creek bottom is to be disturbed, then extensive vegetation and soils information may not be needed. However, this should be more specifically justified. If some vegetated areas are involved, or if the creek bottom area supports vegetation (due to the sporadic flows), then the S.C.S. should be consulted to provide vegetation and soils data. Exhibit E 1. Bank areas above the typical high water park that are disturbed may need to be revegetated as well as sloped to 3:1 or less. Pleas clarify the plans concerning disturbing such areas and, if needed, consult with the S.C.S. on a revegetation plan. Exhibit G 1. Please clarify the situation concerning ownership and legal right-to-enter. I note that Mr. Robert Ashton owns the material to be mined, but Mr. Wilbur Schreiber owns the surface rights and signed the permission for Lincoln County to enter the site and mine. Is Mr. Ashton's signed permission also required for the County to mine? Ellis Allen Pit - File No. M-84-185 Exhibit B ~''y 1. It appears that some areas outside of just the creek bottom are to be S ~ pub disturbed by this mining operation. For example, a clay pit is shown on the ~ map. Any areas outside of the creek bed that are part of this operation ~~t^" hould be described in the mining plan, shown specifically on the map, included in the permit area, and reclaimed. Exhibit D 1. Please provide vegetation data for the entire permit area. The S.C.S. hould be asked to furnish this information (probably via a completed CO-ECS-2 form).