Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br />. naturally but to placate the Division of Wildlife, a small percentage <br />should be utilized in our perennial seed mix. They also felt we could <br />try a plan without sagebrush. <br />Trapper personnel e <br />was most important. The <br />or odd shaped stands and <br />areas was agreed upon by <br />~ article as to animal use <br />copy. <br />Kplained that the re-establishment of shrubs <br />plan of transplanting mature shrubs in "clumps" <br />transplanting shrub tubelings into the open <br />the BLM.~ The wildlife specialist had read an 1 <br />to shrub density. He will try and get us a <br />Browse improvement practices were also discussed. We should have <br />literature to backup our improvement plans. The BLM Range Specialist <br />said he would get us what information that he could. <br />Watering sites were also discussed. It was felt that watering <br />sites should be replaced if they were removed. In addition, watering <br />• sites should not be more than 2 or 3 miles from each other. <br />Conclusions/Recommendations <br />The results of this meeting indicate that some further work is <br />needed on the Trapper Wildlife program to obtain the needed information <br />for a permit application. The following recommendations are proposed. <br />1. Species Inventory. <br />It is evident that the "Latilong Studies" must be obtained for <br />the area concerning Ptammals, avifauna, and herpetofauna. This will <br />provide a good background for the species inventory. Species selection <br />could be made from the study, compared to past ECI studies or field <br />checks made to indicate presence. Some field time would be involved <br />but it will be needed to successfully complete the species inventory. <br /> <br />E-11 <br />