Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Vegetation in the area consists of gambrel oak, mountain mahogany, and short grasses on the slopes, <br />and grasses on the open and flat lands. The proposed site does not contain any wetlands. <br />' Three phased grading plans are provided in Figures 2.2A through 2.2C. Features of the grading plans <br />include preservation of hillsides to the north, knolls to the east and ridges to the south and west. <br />' Material will be mined from a central bowl with untouched areas screening the outside perimeter. A <br />ridge and hillside to the north will remain undisturbed forming a visual barrier. A north facing ridge <br />on the south side, above the access road will also be preserved. This will create backdrop for views <br />' over the ridges from the north. A knoll will be preserved az the east end of the site to screen views <br />from the east. Ihainage basins will remain approximazely the same size, although slopes will change. <br />An erosion control plan will control downstream sediment <br />' The first phase will remove materials from the southwest comer of the site. I•igure 2.2A depicts the <br />initial mining segment, Phase I in its final or reclaimed grade. Note thaz the undisturbed areas, north, <br />south and east of the proposed site will progressively screen the excavation work and equipment <br />When the mining segment has reached its fatal grade, reclamation work will begin on the southern <br />slopes while mining operations commence on Phase fI, the next segment to the north This procedure <br />will limit the actual disturbed surface area az any time while effecting reclamation work during the <br />' early stages of the excavation period. Preservation of visible areas will minimize visual impacts in the <br />early phases. The dominant exposed south face of Phase I will be reclaimed before it becomes visible <br />from the north. <br />1. VISUAL IMPACT' ANALYSIS <br />LI <br />The grading and phasing plan are adapted ro the site to minimize visual impacts from surrounding <br />areas as seen in Fgures 2.2A through 2.2C. Existing, vegetated hillsides will be preserved to screen <br />the site. Phasing of mined areas will minimize visibility at each stage of the project Views of the <br />si[e are further limited by the distances from the site. Ire to the separation from adjacent <br />' development and the dominance of the Rampan Range, the site affects only a faction of the field of <br />vision. <br />The existing, reclaimed pit located above and immediately west of the proposed site is visible but <br />difficult to discern as a mine. The success of the applicant's past reclamation efforts offer visual <br />evidence of the long term minimal impact of a reclaimed gravel pit Reclamation of the existing pit <br />1 primarily involved reseeding of natural grasses with no transplanting of natural shrubs or [rees. <br />Because the reclaimed area is mostly grassed cover on uniform slopes, the configuration of the <br />existing pit can be seen on the 1989 aerial photograph included in the Appendix as Exhibit A. The <br />applicant intends to surpass previous reclamation efforts by creating more natural finished wntours and <br />supplementing grass seeding with transplanting native brush oak and trees. In addition some 210 trees <br />have been purchased by the applicant for planting in the reclaimed area. <br />' The applicant offers three methods of determining the visual impact of the site: a scale foam wre <br />model (1"=100') ,computer enhanced photos and cross sections. The model is derived from existing <br />topography and the proposed grading plan, and is capable of depicting each mining phase as it is <br />completed. The photos illustrate the site from important vistas. Visible mined areas are depicted for <br />each photographic view. The foam core model and the photography are provided separately from this <br /> <br />P-2 <br /> <br />