Laserfiche WebLink
-17- <br />Item: Status of other reclamation sites (Hale Gulch microwave site, adits and shafts, <br />and "miscellaneous"). <br />Res once: <br />Hale Gulch <br />No additional reclamation activities are anticipated. The USFS decided <br />that a contingent amount of surety be held in the event the work already <br />completed did not sustain plant life. Therefore Homestake included a <br />contingency in Exhibit L. <br />Microwave Site <br />Removal of structures followed by minor dressing of the road is planned <br />in accordance with the USFS request. <br />Adits and Shafts <br />While the specific locations of adits and procedures to be used to plug <br />or otherwise abandon, if and where necessary, have not been determined, past <br />submissions to the Division have discussed this in terms of water drainage <br />controls. The item was contained in Homestake's 1980 amendment. It is <br />Homestake's plan to consider safety and water pollution when designing <br />reclamation adits. Such reclamation is planned for "adits and shafts constructed <br />to provide access to underground mining activities" (see 1977 submission to the <br />Division, page 17). Site-specific evaluations and designs would be performed <br />when mining proceeds to the point that adits are encountered that may become <br />a hazard if reclamation is not conducted. <br />"Miscellaneous" <br />This refers to a contingency for minor areas of disturbance which are <br />difficult to identify at this stage, but which will be reclaimed in accord <br />with the objectives and procedures of the overall plan. <br />Item: Recommendation that the sediment dam be breached, rather than leave <br />the structure in place and utilize the spillway as a permanent stream course. <br />Response: Breaching of the sediment dam would essentially involve removal of <br />the entire structure. Homestake believes the sediment pond will serve as an <br />excellent source of water for wildlife and, as appropriate, domestic animals. <br />The dam and current spillway are designed for high hazard conditions. The <br />spillway revisions contemplated would further enhance the safety of the <br />structure. In a meeting on July 16, 1984, the U.S. Forest Service agreed to <br />have Homestake work with the engineers at the Forest Service Regional Office, <br />in the development of structurally safe, and engineering sound design criteria <br />for a spillway, that would permit the sediment dam to remain in place. A copy <br />of the Tetter documenting that agreement is attached. <br />As noted in response to items addressed earlier, Exhibit L has been <br />revised to include an additional $17,000 for exploration, evaluation, and <br />detailed design of the dam. spillway. <br />