My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53867
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:10 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:57:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/31/1984
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy
From
Homestake
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-12- <br />Item: Snowmelt run-off characteristics should be discussed to the extent <br />possible. <br />Response: Homestake chose the 200-year, 24-hour recurrence interval <br />precipitation event as the basis to calculate the design run-off. In <br />general, peak flows related to snowmelt are less than peak flows for rainfall <br />events of greater than 50 year recurrence interval for the mine catchment <br />area. Examination of the run-off for a subbasin of approximately 250 <br />acres for the mine area indicates a rainfall event peak run-off of 105 cfs <br />or 270 csm (cfs/mi2). Using the method outlined in Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board Technical Manual Ho. I for the estimation of peak discharges due to <br />snowmelt, the following values for various recurrence intervals for a similar <br />area may be calculated. <br />Flowrecurrence Peak flow Peak Unit Flow <br />Interval cfs) cfs/mil = csm <br />Q-10 13.3 26.6 <br />Q-50 20.8 41.6 <br />Q-100 23.9 47.8 <br />Q-500 32.7 65.4 <br />Q-200 (interpolated) 27.5 55.0 <br />These calculations are based on a 0.5 square mil drainage area and an annual <br />average precipitation of 27.5 inches and thus may be expected to be somewhat <br />conservative in comparison to the snowmeit event flows for Pitch. <br />It can be seen that the snowmelt run-off event for the same recurrence <br />interval used for design flows was about one quarter of that calculated for <br />the rainfall event. <br />Item: In order to assure that the channel leading to the South Pit is <br />stable, the designs should address riprap gradation and the need for a filter <br />blanket. <br />Response: The final designs will address the sizing and gradation of riprap <br />and requirements to utilize a filter blanket to segregate soil from the riprap. <br />The energy dissipation requirements will determine the size and distribution of <br />the riprap. As in the previously-described case of the spillway, cascade <br />structure, and drainage designs, Homestake has included adequate surety to <br />cover the site specific design of these channels in Exhibit L under the heading <br />"Engineering Investigations and Design." <br />Item: The amendment should address the problem of channel scouring during <br />unvegetated conditions. <br />Response: In order to reduce flows during the early stages of reclamation <br />when revegetation will be ongoing, Homestake will maintain the Crown Ditch <br />diversion. This, as described earlier and as can be seen by the relative <br />size of the area involved, will reduce flows into these ditches in a <br />significant manner. During the period of revegetation, the newly planted <br />areas will be routinely inspected for signs of excessive erosion. <br />Item: The amendment should address the need to install a trash rack for the <br />v-notch weir spillway of the South Pit Lake. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.