My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53867
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:10 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:57:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/31/1984
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy
From
Homestake
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-13- <br />R~esp_onse: The spillway of the South Pit lake is designed with a broad V-notch <br />wei o flow control set within a broad crest, rectangular weir. The <br />principal objective of the V-notch weir was to ensure control over the discharge <br />into the receiving channel. Trash racks have been considered to protect the <br />V-notch weir from plugging, but trash racks also require maintenance. The <br />wide cross section of the spillway channel located above the V-notch weir <br />will provide for passage of flow in the unlikely event the bottom of the <br />V-notch weir becomes plugged. Homestake has undertaken observations regarding <br />the debris that may be anticipated to enter the South Pit lake and, during the <br />final design phase, will evaluate the trade-offs between the flow control <br />requirements and structures which will resist clogging. Our observations to <br />date indicate little accumulation of debris in the channels. These design <br />considerations are included in the surety in Exhibit L under the heading <br />"Engineering Investigations and Design." <br />Item: The amendment should quantify erosion rates off dumps and reclaimed <br />areas and should specify what erosion control measures are necessary to <br />minimize rill and gully formation and ensure vegetative growth. <br />Response: Currently, in the opinion of Homestake and its consultant, no <br />suitable method capable of predicting sediment yield from waste dumps such <br />as these at Pitch, exists. Reclaimed areas will be observed and managed <br />to ensure long-term re vegetation success. Problems caused by the formation of <br />rills or gullies will be corrected as soon as possible. <br />In view of the uncertainty of erosion characteristics of premining <br />conditions, the evidence collected to date regarding reclamation success at <br />the site, and the fact that a number of "flow attentuation areas" wilt be <br />established, including the South Pit Lake, and that these will serve to <br />allow sediment to settle, Homestake does not believe that the additional <br />hypothetical calculations will be of value to the reclamation effort. <br />Item: Drainage designs should specify how run-off from the dump terrace <br />i.e., Tie Camp, Indian Creek) will be safely routed to the base of the <br />pile without causing undue erosion of the shoulders of the pile. <br />Response: Experience has shown that run-off that would occur will create <br />negligible erosion of the dump face. Sloping of the dump terraces slightly <br />inward minimizes potential for erosion. The detailed designs are necessary to <br />assess the need for additional erosion controls at locations where drainage <br />is dropped to lower levels of the shoulders of the pile. If necessary, <br />inclusion of relatively coarse rock, including exposed bedrock, at the edge <br />of the waste dumps would further control erosion, and aid in routing water <br />to the base of the pile, <br />As final drainage designs are developed, the placement of energy <br />dissipation devices, arranging of channels, and diversion of surface run-off <br />along the dump terraces will be addressed in a site-specific manner. In all <br />cases, the desired approach will be to limit drainage areas and flows to <br />relatively small amounts and to direct flows along the more stable, low <br />sloping areas. Where this is not possible, drainages will be examined to <br />determine the erosive character of the channel material, and covering to <br />enhance resistance to erosion will be added when necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.