Laserfiche WebLink
-11- <br />During reclamation, the Crown Ditch will be maintained and kept <br />operative. Therefore run-off from the area upstream of the Crown Ditch <br />will be diverted away, and will not affect, the reclaimed drainages. When <br />the area is reclaimed (stabilized), the Ditch will be breached. At that <br />time the curve number representative of the entire area should again be 60. <br />Comparison of run-off charts for CPl 60 and CN 72 indicates that the flows <br />along the drainages in the disturbed area should be about the same in the <br />early stages of reclamation as they will be after reclamation when the <br />diversion is breached. <br />Item: With regard to the cascade drop structure, the amendment should address <br />ho'w durable and competent the rock slope is in this area and whether it <br />would be appropriate to include an energy dissipator at the base of the <br />structure. <br />Response: As discussed on page 11 of the Supplemental Report 5-1, if competent <br />bedrock cannot be found, a design to accommodate the lack of competence <br />would be adopted. Reconnaissance analysis of the likely site indicates <br />that competent bedrock may exist. <br />In view of the continuing need to design the cascade structure based on <br />additional site analysis, Homestake hds included a line item in the surety <br />calculations of Exhibit L, under the heading "Engineering Investigations <br />and Design," of $10,000 for the designing of the cascade structure. <br />The cascade structure will incorporate energy dissipating features in <br />order to achieve its purpose. <br />Item: How is drainage to be handled along the areas that are to be reclaimed <br />in the North Pit and how will the drainage be affected by earth movement <br />(settlement)? <br />Response: Homestake plans to perform the necessary grading ("dressing") <br />after the landslide has reached its equilibrium (stable) configuration. <br />The design of the drainages will conform to the objective of allowing <br />limited amounts of water to drain down protected faces of the fill. Water <br />bars can be incorporated into the design should they be necessary to control <br />erosion. At the shallow grades involved, such structures may not be necessary. <br />Homestake agrees that since these designs will evolve as site-specific data <br />and are collected during the initial phases of reclamation, adequate surety <br />should be included. Therefore an item for final design for grading and <br />drainage of the disturbed area has been included in Exhibit L under the <br />section titled "Engineering Investigation and Designs." <br />Item: Is the intersection between the South Pit drainage and the drainage <br />above the Tie Camp dump to be armored? <br />Response: As in the case of responses to the two previous items, Homestake <br />plans to develop site specific construction designs that will have as their <br />objective protection of the drainage. The design will take into account the <br />potential for excessive erosion at the intersection noted and additional <br />armoring will be used if necessary. All drainage junctions will be so <br />evaluated. As stated above in response to other items, surety for final design <br />for drainage of the disturbed area has been included in Exhibit L under the <br />section titled "Engineering Investigation and Design." <br />