My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53695
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:52:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.7 HYDROLOGY DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
office showed higher levels of zinc than the crusher well and is also above the <br />• recommended drinking water quality limits. <br />Monitoring of sediment ponds (Tables 2.04.7-8, 2.04.7-9, and 2.04.7-10) was <br />also performed by Sun Coal personnel. At this time monitoring lower sedimen- <br />tation pond has been discontinued because a pond was reclaimed. Water quality <br />in these ponds is acceptable in relation to drinking water standards with the <br />exception of iron and total dissolved solids. Anew pond was constructed near <br />the crusher (crusher pond) (Table 2.04.7-9) in October 1984 and was monitored <br />weekly during the spring of 1985 along with another pond at the south end of the <br />permit area (south pond) (Table 2.04.7-10). These two ponds are now being moni- <br />tored on a quarterly monitoring schedule and in accordance with NPDES permit <br />stipulations. <br />Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead, and selenium in both the <br />• crusher pond and the south pond are at or below detection levels and below <br />recorded concentrations in the Yampa River. Total volatile solids concentra- <br />tions are approximately the same in the ponds and the river. The crusher pond, <br />however, does exhibit parameters that average three times higher than the Yampa <br />River. Parameters that appear to be elevated include calcium, bicarbonate, <br />magnesium, sodium, sulfate, zinc, and total dissolved solids; whereas, iron, <br />manganese, phosphorus, and total suspended solids are less. The water quality <br />characteristics for the south pond (Impoundment No. 11 (Table 2.04.7-10), when <br />compared to the Yampa River TDS concentrations, are six times larger. <br />Although the wells and the ponds exhibit elevated levels of many parameters <br />tested, the water quality of the Yampa River has remained constant. It does not <br />appear that the drainage from the permit area is having any adverse effect on <br />. the water quality of either the ground water or the Yampa River. <br />- 103 - (Rev. 5/86) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.