My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53695
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:52:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.7 HYDROLOGY DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />All sites have been sampled and analyzed for 17 parameters, including arse- <br />nic, bicarbonate, cadmium, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, phospho- <br />rus, selenium, sodium, sulfate, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, <br />total volatile solids, and zinc. Samples were taken by Sun Coal personnel and <br />sent to Bookcliffs Laboratory in Steamboat Springs for analysis. <br />The water quality of the Yampa (Tables 2.04.7-5 and 2.04.7-61 is relatively <br />• <br />consistent and does not appear to have been significantly affected by any con- <br />tamination from past mining activities. All concentrations are within water <br />quality standards with the exception of iron and manganese. There is no <br />increase in the concentrations of these two parameters from the upstream site to <br />the downstream site. A significant increase was seen in total volatile solids <br />at the downstream site (Table 2.04.7-6) several times from 1982 to 1983. There <br />is no known cause for these higher concentrations. The parameter concentrations <br />corresponded with USGS Yampa River water-quality studies done. The concentra- <br />tions of most parameters were generally higher during the periods of low flow in <br />the fall and winter months. <br />The average ground water quality (Table 2.04.7-3) concentrations were <br />• <br />generally higher than the concentrations of the Yampa River (Tables 2.04.7-5 and <br />2.04.7-6) with the exception of manganese, total suspended solids, and total <br />volatile solids. There appears to be no significant difference between the <br />wells and the surface water for these parameters. Concentrations of arsenic, <br />cadmium, mercury, and selenium are at or below detection limit in both the wells <br />and the Yampa River. Other parameters, including bicarbonate, calcium, iron, <br />lead, magnesium, phosphorus, sodium, sulfate, zinc, and total dissolved solids <br />averaged three times higher in the wells than in the Yampa River. At this time <br />there is no known reason for these higher levels. The well near the trailer <br />- 102 - <br />(Rev. 5/86) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.