Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br />lOb) Has the amended application changed the scope of the proposed operation <br />so much that a new application, not an amendment, be required? 27A. <br />11. Has the applicant identified all the other licenses and permits which are <br />required and committed to obtain them? <br />Item 8 (see Page 5 of Issues-attached) of the issues that DMG staff did not <br />consider to be within jurisdiction of the Board in reference to the amended <br />application is to be heard by the Board. <br />IV. ISSUES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED <br />Issues the Division Believes Are Not Within the Jurisdiction of the Board fOrieinal Application) <br />Safety hazazd of being a collector highway (U.S. Highway 50); trucks on County Road 157 <br />and the highway <br />2. Changes the basic chazacter and use of land at Parkdale. <br />3. County Planning and Zoning Board, by approving the operation, failed to protect the utility <br />and value and future of the land at Parkdale. <br />4. Adverse impacts on air quality. <br />5. The maps are misleading in the designation of nearby buildings as ranch houses, when they <br />are really buildings associated with the D & RG and of some historic significance. <br />6. The location is incompatible to non-motorized traffic on the river and would cause yeaz- <br />round serious traffic congestion on the highway. <br />7. The mining operation would cost Fremont County more to monitor various needs than it <br />could ever bring benefit. <br />8. Aggregate mine's non-compliance with the Fremont County's master plan for preserving <br />scenic Highway 50 -Arkansas River Corridor. <br />9. Possible affects of the proposed project on recreation and tourism industries are not <br />addressed. <br />]0. The proposed project should give some consideration [o the effects of the mine on visual <br />resources. <br />1 1. Blasting, crushing, screening and loading will create a severe noise problem affecting the <br />-6- <br />