Laserfiche WebLink
• The critical failure surfaces for total stress analyses were generally deep block-type surfaces <br />through the gob, extending to and along the contact with the native ground surface. As expected, <br />the critical failure surfaces for effective stress analyses were shallow. For these analyses, the <br />failure surface was forced a minimum of 5 feet into the gob to avoid insignifjcant critical failure <br />surfaces at or near the surface of the gob. The factor of safety was not affected for analyses <br />considering a high water table (groundwater up to 5 feet below the native ground surface). <br />6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />A stability evaluation of the proposed Gob Pile No. 3 has been conducted for Bowie Resources <br />No. 2 mine near Paonia, Colorado. The stability evaluation was based on a geotechnical site <br />investigation and previous and on-going testing of gob and foundation soils. Limiting <br />equilibrium stability analyses were conducted using total and effective stress analyses for static <br />conditions. Various gob configurations, defjned by gob slope and ultimate wastepile height, are <br />presented that result in a minimum critical factor of safety of 1.50. <br />Foundation preparation, surface and subsurface water drainage, and gob placement all affect the <br />stability of the gob pile. The following recommendations are provided to fulfill assumptions <br />made in our evaluation and to ensure an adequate safety margin for the gob pile: <br />1. To provide an adequate foundation bearing surface, topsoil, loose fill, man-made debris, <br />organic material, and all other deleterious material must be removed prior to gob <br />placement. If soft or yielding soils are encountered, they should be removed until <br />competent soils are encountered. <br />2. Foundation underdrains should be designed and constructed to keep the near surface <br />foundation soils drained. We understand these drains are to be designed by others. <br />Improving the lining system of the upslope Fire Mountain Canal is recommended to <br />reduce seepage into the gob pile foundation. <br />3. To improve stability along the base of the gob pile (reducing potential for ablock-type <br />failure along the contact of the native soil and gob), the native subgrade should be <br />"benched" or "keyed" into the slope. <br />4. Upgradient surface water should be captured and routed away from or around the gob <br />pile by adequately sized diversion channels. <br />5. The gob pile should be designed and graded to shed surface water and precipitation off <br />all portions of the gob pile both during and after gob placement. <br />6. Gob must be placed at, or slightly below its optimum moisture content. Gob placed <br />significantly above the optimum moisture content likely will not achieve adequate <br />compaction or undrained shear strength. Placement techniques that allow for drying gob <br />may be required at times. Once a suitable moisture content is achieved, gob should be <br />sealed (by compaction) to minimize infiltration from precipitation and should be graded <br />to shed water per the drainage plan. <br />Rowie Gob Pile No. 3 stability report <br />Project N06-48I-002 <br />Page I S of 17 <br />