Laserfiche WebLink
That is, there nearly always seems to be some residual error, some excess concentration <br />or not enough of some element to totally explain the geochemistry. <br />In the present case, there appears to be a relatively straightforward solution that <br />closely relates the general geochemistry of the fault waters to the seep water. Moreover, <br />there seems to be an even closer geochemical similarity between the Edwards Portal seep <br />water and the Lone Pine Seal water. Even further, the Lone Pine seal water lies more or <br />less on a trajectory, in Piper diagram space, between the fault waters and the seep water, <br />with very minor deviation being explained by higher Na and K in the Lone Pine Seal and <br />higher sulfate in the seep. Together, these suggest that the Lone Pine seal waters describe <br />an intermediate composition between the faults and the seep, with minor deviations to be <br />explained. <br />The following sections describe a plausible interpretation of the data for the West <br />Elk situation. <br />Maintenance of High Temperature at the Seep. <br />Since the seep was first monitored, temperature has fluctuated very little. <br />Division records indicate variations on the order of tenths of a degree to a few degrees <br />since November 1997. Thus, because the temperature has remained relatively constant, <br />and high, there must be a constant supply of heat to the seep water source. If [he fault <br />waters reach the seep via seepage though the coal wall, down-dip of the sump, then the <br />sump water itself must be the source of the thermal mass. Without a heat source at that <br />point, the seep water could not have maintained the treasured high temperatures. West <br />Elk Mines maintains that the seep water heat comes from thermal waters beneath or close <br />to the seep. An alternative simple explanation seems possible. <br />When warm fault waters (at least 85 to 95 degrees F, and possibly higher) were <br />encountered, they were conveyed to the NW Panels sealed sump. As the sump eventually <br />filled. water was discharged to the North Fork Gunnison River via the Lone Pine Gulch <br />pipeline. Because warm incoming water is eventually discharged via the Lone Pine <br />Gulch pipeline, a relatively high temperature has been maintained in the sump. Thus, a <br />relatively constant, high temperature has been maintained in the seep. <br />Major Element Chemistry and pH. <br />The geochemical composition of the fault waters does not match that of the seep. <br />West Elk Mine maintains that this is evidence that the two waters come from different <br />sources, through different fractures. Waters in the Rollins Sandstone are targeted as a <br />possible source. However, the Rollins Sandstone water is likewise of a composition <br />different from the seep. While [his does not dismiss the Rollins as the direct source of the <br />seep water, it does require an explanation of how the Rollins water evolved into the seep <br />water. That path is at least as complicated as a path from the fault waters to the seep <br />water. a feasible model for evolution of the seep water from [he fault water via <br />interaction with certain minerals and meteoric water can be developed. <br />4 <br />