Laserfiche WebLink
~J <br /> <br /> <br />i~ <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />5.0 STABILITY ANALYSIS <br />5.1 DES.ISI1 PARAMETERS <br />The design parameters for the slope stability analysis were based <br />on both previous laboratory testing on the various rock materials <br />in Rocky Mountain Geotechnical's report dated August 25, 1981 and <br />November 3, 1981, and from previous experience with the types of <br />soils encountered at this particular site. <br />The strength parameters for the rock materials were based on the <br />unconfined compressive strengths summarized in the Rocky Mountain <br />Geotechnical November 3, 1981 report. These unconfined <br />compressive strengths, as summarized on Table 1.0, were then used <br />to develop shear strength parameters to be used in the slope <br />stability analysis by utilizing a method described in <br />"Underground Excavations in Rock" by E. Hoek and E.T. Brown. <br />This method utilizes approximate equations for principal stress <br />relationships and Mohr Envelopes for intact rock and joint rock <br />masses based on extensive laboratory testing. In order to use <br />these equations, the rock masses were first classified based on <br />data obtained during the field reconnaissance trip and from the <br />previous soil boring program. A Classification of Intact Rock <br />Strength (CSIR) rating was developed for each individual rock <br />mass. A shear stress equation from which the rock's friction <br />angle and cohesion intercept could be determined was established <br />for the given type of rock mass by knowning its CSIR rating and <br />its unconfined compressive strength. These values, as summarized <br />in Table 1, were then utilized in the slope stability analysis. <br />7 <br />