My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:16 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/19/1984
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX G Rocky Mtn Geotechnical - Red Canyon #2 Portal Cut Investigation 3/84
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />The calculated friction and cohesion values for the various <br />materials corresponded very closely to data used in previous <br />reports for the same project site. <br />1 The shear strength for the proposed bench fill material was based <br />on previous testing on typical refuse material as stated in the <br />August 25, 1981 Rocky Mountain Geotechnical report concerning the <br />' refuse disposal area slope stability analysis. This study <br />' indicated that a friction angle of 28 degrees and cohesion of 200 <br />psf can be expected for this type of material. <br />The assumed position of the water table is extremely important to <br />a stability analysis. Information supplied to us by Western <br />' Associated Coal Company indicated that the current water table at <br />the site near the existing sedimentation pond in the immediate <br />t vicinity of the proposed portal cut is currently approximately <br />Elevation 6306. To be conservative, the water table was set at <br />t Elevation 6320 near the portal face. Although the water table <br />' for the proposed benches should remain relatively low or <br />completely dry, a Case II groundwater profile as described in the <br />' book Rock Slooe Enaineerina was assumed. This case assumes that <br />the phreatic surface slopes upward from the toe of the berm to a <br />point 8 times the height of the berm behind the toe of the slope. <br />5.2 FAILURE ~~ <br />In soil slopes, although planar-type failures are possible in <br />stratified deposits, the most common mechanism of failure <br />' 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.