PERMFILE44705

• Permit No: M1992060
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 9/2/1992
• Doc Name: LAGOON PIT FN M-92-060 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF PERMIT APPLICATION
• From: MLRD
• To: CITY OF MONTE VISTA
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• •
Mr. Joe Kurys - 3 - September 2, 1992
Exhibit C
The thickness of the overburden is indicated to be 18". The thickness of
the topsoil to be replaced is said to be 12" on Exhibit E map. No
mention is made of any intention to stockpile, and/or stabilize topsoil
from the site until its replacement. The question exists if topsoil is
to be imported for reclamation.
The applicant should commit to the salvage of 12" of topsoil, in order to
provide for replacement or that thickness. Any stockpiling of this
rnateriai must be described as well as how and with what the stockpiles
are to be stabilized, e.g., vegetated. Locations of the stockpiles
should be indicated on the Exhibit E maps.'
the locations of any overburden stockpiles, separate from topsoil
stockpiles, are not indicated although some separation or 12" of topsoil
from the 18" of total overburden is indicated.
If topsoil is to be separated from the remainder of the overburden, then
any stockpiles of overburden should be indicated on the Exhibit E maps.
l'he Division accepts the applicants' commitment not to disturb over
10 acres, but the locations of the intended areas of disturbance,
~a.g. pits, steckpiles are not indicated on any map so that the amount of
disturbed area can be confirmed.
the applicant, as requested earlier in :his revie~.+, should indicate where
the areas of disturbance, i.e. pits, stockpiles, etc. are to be located
on the E:<hibit E moos.
Nothing is provided t~~.at indicates Ncs. 8 througn 13 or 'the application
form were considered dy the applicant.
The applicant should indicate that he :nos considered the issues raised by
Ncs. 8 through 13 of the application `orm and either provide the
information requested or indicate suc~ concerns are not applicable to
this proposed operation.
E:<hibit D
The applicant has indicated on pane 3 ~f the application that he intends
the primary future (post mining) lane r 2 to be sold waste disposal.
The statement under E~nibit D indicates the intent by the city to replace
the gravel removed •.vith adobe taken '-om city streets.
The applicant must make clear the nar;r= of all material to be piac?d in
the areas of excavated gravel, e.g. ~:~".~ the solid waste consist on1•i of
this adobe or will other ~.vaste be disco>ed her?? If other waste fs to be
placed here, the nature of that rust? -:.,.t be described and its
hydrologic impacts evaluated under E~r'bit C. Other county or state
permits may be required if this aria '; actually to be a landfill.
There i5 no indication cf the maximum ;radient of the reclaimed slopes
for that portion of the affected area `n the NE SW Section 32, i.a.,
north of and adjacent t~ East Drive.