PERMFILE44705 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

/ / Mr. Joe Kurys • - 2 - • September 2, 1992 Exhibit A It is uncertain just what parts and ho•.+ much of Section 32, Township 39N, Range 8E N.M.P.M. are to be included in the permit area and to comprise affected area. Information on the first page of the application indicates location of the permit area to be in the NE SW of Section 32. That would appear to correspond to the 17 acre tract that adjoins the Willow Crest Nursing Home site north Of East Drive: If, as the lease indicates, 5.04 acres of this tract ar? not involved, then this leaves a total of 11.96 acres in that area. In other portions of the permit application, references are made to a ~ acre tract that appears to lie in the NW SW NW of Section 32 and to anoLner 4 acre tract that lies in the northern part of the SW NW Section 32, occupying the area immediately north of Pond #l. While the legal description for the 6 acre tract in NW SW NW Section 32 does appear to total 5 acres, measurements made of the map representation provided of the 4 acre tract north of Pond 1 appears to yield an area of more than 4 acres, i.e. approximately 6.5 acres. Even under the most conservative interpretation, a total of nearly 22 acres seems to be involved (11.96 6 + 4) or as much as 24.5 acres (11.96 + 6 + 6.5) in the proposed permit area. This does not agree with the 17 acres stated to be in the permit area cn page 1 of the application. The applicant will have to mere accurately specify and indicate cn Exhibit E maps which tracts and which parts of which tracts are to make up the permit area and provide accurate total acreage values. The applicant will also have to specify and indicate on the Exhibit E maps the areas of intended disturbance ~dhicn must total less than 10 acres in e:<tent. E±hibit A. (COnt'd) The applicant indicates that, in C352 :f the 2 tracts totaling 10 to 12.` acres in the SW NW Section 32, that the city is the surrounding sur'ac2 landowner. It is nor clear to the Division, however, if the city owns all the surf ac? adjacent to the 11.96 acre tract in the NE SW Section 32. The applicant should review 'the proper-y ownership in the areas cf all three tracts that may be included in the permit area and indicate if the city owns all the surface adjacent to Lnes2 tracts. if not, these owners should be indicated on the Exhibit E mass of the permit area and should be notified of the permit application. F<hihit R Ther? is no description cf the soli C~aracteristics in the areas of the proposed operation. The adplicant should contact the 1oca~ cfflce of the Soil Conservation Service and s?cure a description of the soils in the pr:;oosed permit ar?a in order to satisfy this requir?men t.