My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44359
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:46:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:54:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/1989
Doc Name
BATTLE MTN RESOURCES INCADEQUACY COMMENTS
From
CAMILLE M FARRELL
To
STEVE G RENNER
Section_Exhibit Name
Adequacy letter
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT E - RECLAMATION PLAN <br />Section E.1 Present and Past Land Use <br />56. The heap leach developed in the project area as part of mining activities <br />in the 1970's was inspected by the Division in 1986. The vegetation observed <br />growing there at the time was identified as being dominated by weed species, <br />including rabbitbrush, fox tail barley, etc. Some desirable perennial species <br />of wheatgrass, bluegrass, and currant were also observed, but in very limited <br />quantities. In addition to heavy grazing, it appears that mining-related <br />disturbances have also altered the composition of the native plant <br />communitites form grasslands to predominantly rabbitbrush, another unpalatable <br />forage species. However, it is promising to note that with proper management, <br />the previous heap material has the potential to sustain vegetation <br />commensurate with the final land use. <br />Section E.2 General Reclamation Procedures <br />57. The narrative explains that Figure F-1 shows the post-mining <br />configuration; however, upon review of the contours illustrated on Figure F-1 <br />and the complete reclamation plan, it appears that Figure F-1 does not <br />graphically represent the proposed final contours of the waste rock disposal <br />facilities, the east and west pits, and does not provide continuity of the <br />proposed final contours of the heap pad, mill facility and the western open <br />pit with the existing adjacent topographic contours. Please amend Figure F-1 <br />to illustrate final topographic configurations of each facility and continuity <br />of those final configurations with those of existing adjacent topographic <br />contours. <br />Section E.2.1 Topsoil/Growth Medium Stockpiling and Use <br />58. Persuant to Minerals Rules and Regulations Number 6.4(1), topsoil <br />(generally the A and B soil horizons) is required to be salvaged and <br />stockpiled separately form the subsoil beneath it. Replacement would occur in <br />the reverse order. Segregating the subsoil from the topsoil maintains the <br />superior plant establishment and growth qualities of the topsoil; mixture of <br />topsoil and subsoil negates the superior qualities exhibited by topsoil. <br />Please commit to such. <br />59. Figure C-1 illustrates only one topsoil stockpile location. It is <br />assumed that the topsoil salvaging and eventual reclamation operations over <br />the entire 550 acres of disturbance will necessitate topsoil and subsoil <br />stockpile locations closer to the areas requiring growth media replacement. <br />Please illustrate the expected topsoil and subsoil stockpile locations for the <br />entire operating site on the appropriate Figures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.