My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42028
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:34 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:00:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997086
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/7/1998
Doc Name
SILOAM STONE BEDROCK MINE MLR PERMIT M-97-086 ADEQUACY REVIEW RESPONSE
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ENVIRONMENT. INC. PAt3E B <br />HILOAM 67ONE -BEDROCK MINE <br />M.L.R.B. PERMIT i~ M-97-OB6 <br />JANUARY 7, 1 99B <br />(5) 1 stated in Exhibit M, a stormwater tnanagethent parinit (SGIMP) <br />will not be needed. In 1993, I was part of an industry <br />group that prepared a Model Guide for SWMP's. The regula- <br />tions say that if stormwater does not come in contact with <br />disturbed area or is retained on site then a permit is not <br />needed. Any stormwater contacting the disturbed site is <br />considered "process waters" and to discharge this water you <br />have to have an NPDES permit. I used this experience to <br />determine a permit is not needed. I will stat that if that <br />changes we will get a permit as required prior to discharge. <br />6.4.8 Exhibit H - t~ldlife Information <br />I disagree that a more detailed analysis of the impacts this <br />operation will have on wildlife is needed. As stated ear- <br />lier it will take MANY years to develop the entire site. <br />Since an estimated 15.0 acres of slab mining and 5 acres of <br />surface rock area disturbed at one time, 938 of the site <br />will be reclaimed by the time the final area is mined. what <br />this means is that 78 of the site will be disturbed at any <br />one time and this will have a negligible impact on wildlife <br />using the site. There is afar greater chance that housing <br />and development around the site will have more impact than <br />the operation will have. The water supply will not be <br />disrupted, if anything the short term accumulation of water <br />in the mined area will supply more sites for wildlife to <br />drink. DOW was not contacted since we had wildlife informa- <br />tion from an adjoining mine. I would assume that if they <br />did not respond to your notice that they were not concerned <br />because of the limited yearly disturbance. I would welcome <br />their comments as well. <br />6.4.10 Exhibit J -Vegetation Information <br />(1) Attached is an addendum to be added to the application. It <br />addresses points (a) and (b). <br />(2) Map Exhibit C was revised to show the necessary vegetation <br />information as explained on page 1 of this response. <br />6.4.12 Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs <br />(1) You're correct it should be 12 inches. <br />(2) This confusion may be cleared up by reviewing the attached <br />sketch showing a typical slab rock mining area. Since <br />sloping and recoiling will run concurrent with mining the <br />amount of work and the push distance can be limited to 390 <br />or less. Once the area is open the topsoil can be removed <br />from the face area and spread or stored on the area where <br />mining is complete so only the immediate mine work area will <br />need recoiling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.