Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ENVIRONMENT, INC. ~aApE 7 <br />BILDAM BTONE - BEDROCK MINE <br />M.L.R.B. PERMIT i~ M-97-OH6 <br />JANUARY 7, 1998 <br />that there is no aquifer within 100 feet of the sur- <br />face. <br />(c) As stated earlier a small berm or ditch will be con- <br />structed around the upgradient side of each excavation <br />area to prevent surface runoff from entering the dis- <br />turbed areas. Where rain water or snowmelt accumulates <br />in the excavated area it will be directed to a low <br />point in the excavation and retained until it soaks in <br />or evaporates. Since the slab rock area will be de- <br />pressed no sediment traps will be needed. There is no <br />bridge at the point where the tributary canyon enters <br />the site. This is a mistake on the map that I just <br />found out about. There are corrugated metal culverts <br />under the road at this point and the easiest way to <br />assure water continues to flow in the tributary water- <br />way will be to avoid changing the character of the <br />water course until it reaches a deeper part of the <br />canyon. This may mean we have to limit slab rock <br />mining immediately adjacent to the water course. The <br />removal of surface stone in this area will not affect <br />the natural flow of water so that could continue. This <br />same plan would work on the north end as well. <br />The only stormwater that we have to retain on the site <br />is that water that comes in contact with disturbed <br />areas (process water). By allowing it to accumulate in <br />the bottom of the mine, we can control the quality of <br />water leaving the mined area. Once reclamation is <br />complete and the site is revegetated, any water leaving <br />the site would be the same quality as it is now so no <br />permit is needed. Since no structures need to be built <br />to retain the process water no designs are necessary. <br />No long term accumulation will occur in the mined area. <br />To find out if water will accumulate in the excavation <br />I used the same analyses method dictated by the State <br />Engineers guidelines for lake evaporation. In that <br />analysis 708 of the average precipitation is used by <br />plants and 30~ returns to the system as evaporation or <br />soak in. You then subtract yearly precipitation from <br />the average pan evaporation numbers from NOAA Technical <br />Report 33 to get the net evaporation from the lake <br />surface. Assuming, the accumulated water is like a <br />lake you can find whether water will accumulate in the <br />mined area. In this case, the NOAH report shows there <br />is 47.5 inches of surface evaporation per year and we <br />have 13.1 inches of average rain fall. The net result <br />is a negative number {(13.1"*0.7)-47.5" _ -38.33")} so <br />no water will accumulate in the mine for any extended <br />period. This is true, since during the last 20 years <br />there have been no problems with appreciable amounts of <br />water accumulating in the Siloam Mine that this permit <br />area surrounds. <br />