My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-07-15_PERMIT FILE - M1974052
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1974052
>
1985-07-15_PERMIT FILE - M1974052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 6:39:54 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:52:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974052
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/15/1985
Doc Name
VARRA COMPANIES INC AMENDMENT FN M-74-52
From
RINDAHL & ASSOCIATES
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
x` I <br /> 10 Mf. David Berry <br /> July 15, 1985 <br /> Page Seven <br /> 5. Fertilizer - We concur with your cost estimate of $50.00. At <br /> nearly 200 lbs/acre of available phosphorus and nitrogen, <br /> retailers charge $50.00/acre - that includes fertilizer and <br /> application. <br /> 6. Mulch (Hay) - The average cost is $125.00/acre which includes <br /> distribution and crimping. <br /> Consultation with reclamation service companies in the Denver <br /> metro area indicates the reclamation costs of this application to <br /> be acceptable. These are retail prices, not current bid prices <br /> or operator costs, which would be much lower. <br /> To seed, fertilize and mulch - $300.00 per acre is an easy, <br /> accurate number to work with. We will continue to use $50.00 per <br /> h6ur at one acre per hour for ripping and scarifying or disci.ng, <br /> otherwise seedbed preparation, as the local retailers charge <br /> $30.00 to $40.00 per hour at one acre per hour. <br /> Rindahl & Associates, Inc. feels the Division's recommended <br /> bond amount and reclamation costs are inappropriate for the <br /> expense MLRB would incur to reclaim the disturbance. We will <br /> continue to use the same costs used and agreed upon by the <br /> Division, through all applications submitted by our firm, for <br /> the past six months. <br /> This is the first time we have seen a topsoil hauling charge <br /> included in the reclamation costs. We do not include it because <br /> it is actually part of the mining plan. <br /> Most operations strip the topsoil on the plant site area and <br /> initial mining parcel and stockpile it as close as feasible to <br /> the area which will be reclaimed last. This makes the final <br /> hauling distance as short as possible. After the initial <br /> stockpiling, topsoil removal and distribution proceed on a <br /> rotation cycle throughout the mining operation. Topsoil is no <br /> longer stockpiled but stripped from the area to be mined and <br /> immediately replaced on the tract previously mined. This results <br /> in one haul which becomes part of the mining process, not the <br /> reclamation process. <br /> Topsoil for reclamation of the plant site of this amendment <br /> is accounted for in the original Pit #1 permit, as this is where <br /> materials processing will take place for Phases I and II. The <br /> two acre stockpile area costs are included in case there is <br /> minimal stockpiling of topsoil and/or overburden. After it's <br /> reclaimed, the bonded costs will suffice for the two acre plant <br /> site (alternate) if set up. As stated, it may or may not be <br /> incorporated into the mining plan at a later date . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.