Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'~ <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 3, #4(a)(3) <br />"3. Refer to page 780-6. The applicant should submit <br />spoil volume calculations to substantiate that excess <br />spoil will be generated by the operation." <br />See pp. 816-124(a), 816_125(a), 816-126(a), <br />816-127(a)-(r) <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 3, $4(a)(4) <br />"4. Refer to 780-7. The applicant should indicate <br />what haul road will be used to transport spoil material <br />from the southern box cut to the overburden stockpile <br />#2." <br />See 780-7(a)(b), Map 2 <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 4, #4(a)(5) <br />"5. The applicant should demonstrate that sufficient <br />material exists in the final six spoil ridges to fill <br />the final cuts of the operation. This should be done <br />for each area where this request is being made. The <br />information is required to evaluate the variance request <br />of six spoil ridges." <br />Revisitation of the volumes necessary to backfil <br />the final cuts has demonstrated that the 6 spoil <br />ridge variance request is unnecessary. The variance <br />request is withdrawn. <br />See also, p. 780-112(a) <br />12/26/79 Memo, p. 4, $4(a)(6) <br />"6. The applicant has not indicated the 1987 mining <br />unit on the Energy #1 and 2 map." <br />Indication of a 1987 mining unit on the Energy #1 <br />and 2 map is inapplicable, as all activity in <br />mining areas depicted on that map will end in <br />1986. <br />See also, Map 2 <br />