Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> <br />u ion <br />2.05.3(3)(c) Page 5-10(7) states sizing designs for the culverts are included in <br />Appendix 5-2. This data was not included. Page 5-12(1) states water <br />consumption is estimated at 75 acre feet per yard; water rights for this <br />water must be allocated. <br />Response <br />Culvert designs will be resubmitted in the upcoming submittal. The water <br />rights are shown as well permits enclosed in Appendix 3-4. <br />uesti n <br />2.05.3(4) Each of the diversion and <br />following: <br />• <br />drainage ditch designs should include the <br />1. Equations, calculatiaos, and assumptions nn the program used. <br />2. Typical cross sections. <br />3. Roughness coefficients. <br />4. Slopes. <br />5. Flow depths. <br />b. VCtOCItICS. <br />7. Discharges. <br />Both ponds need certified as-builds to include a cross section of the <br />embankment, elevations of the primary and emergency spillways, area <br />capacity curves, and a typo map of the ponds. <br />Pond I does not have an emergency spillway for the 25 year event in <br />accordance with Rule 4,05.6(3)(d) and will have to be modified. Sediment <br />storage levels markers need to be designed and installed in both ponds to <br />indicate the level of sediment in the ponds at any given time. The <br />sediment control plan map needs to include and delineate the entire <br />drainage basin that drains into the ponds. <br />Topsoil pile numbers on the maps do not follow the topsoil pile numbers <br />int he tables. <br />Page 12(4) indicates straw bales to be placed for the west scope of the fill. <br />To what purpose are these bales intended tor? <br />Page 5-13(4F) wiry is the drainage area smaller than originally planned? <br />• Page 5-13(7) "The Sediment Control Plan ... works only if pit storage is <br />available." Currently, pit storage is not available. Does this imply the <br />installed sediment control system is inadequate to handle current <br />conditions? <br />-7- <br />UC-C 2 2 1992 <br />