My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13081
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:23 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:37:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/28/1981
Doc Name
GRAND MESA PERMIT APPLICATION FN C-034-81
From
MLR
To
GRAND MESA COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Seven <br />Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Grand Mesa Coal Co. - Red Canyon Mine <br />Aoril 28, 1981 <br />2.05.3 (9) Underground Development Waste <br />The application expands the waste disposal area indicated in past permits. <br />The expanded refuse pile has an approximate total capacity of 500,000 cu. <br />yds., with an anticipated annual waste production rate of 33,000 cu. yds. <br />The application references two separate geotechnical analyses performed <br />within the mine plan area in the past. These analyses should be included <br />within the permit documents. The application states that a geotechnical <br />investigation conducted by Armstrong Engineers 6 Assoc., Inc., in May of <br />1980, was used as a reference in determining the stability of the proposed <br />fill and of its final slopes. However, the critical section analyzed by <br />Armstrong 6 Associates, Znc., was significantly different from those <br />depicted in drawings 2.05.3(9)-2 through 6. The older fill was deposited <br />in an existing strip pit whereas the enlarged proposed fill will occupy <br />a sloped foundational area. <br />The applicant should analyze the critical worst case slope section of <br />the enlarged proposed fill using a sophisticated mathematical technique, <br />such as the modified Bishop's method utilized by Armstrong & Assoc., Inc., <br />in their earlier analysis. Mechanical properties used in the earlier <br />analyses are probably representative, but should be reviewed by the <br />professional preparing the new analysis to ascertain their appropriateness, <br />Zn keeping with the Division's request during past reviews, the applicant <br />will have to install appropriate piezometer/test wells to monitor ground <br />water quality and elevation above, within and below the proposed refuse <br />disposal site. <br />2.05.9 Reclamation Plan <br />2.05.4 (2) (a) Reclamation Timetable <br />1. The application states that reclamation of the waste disposal pile will <br />involve a continuing cycle of overburden and topsoil stripping and replacement. <br />The applicant should provide estimates of the acreage to be disturbed by <br />various phases of the reclamation process during each year of the permit <br />term. This would include projections for acreage from which topsoil and <br />overburden has been stripped, area of active disposal, area backfilled, <br />topsoiled, and area reseeded each year. <br />2. The applicant states that specific dates for the various reclamation <br />activities are dependent upon the rate of fill. However, projections on <br />waste disposal requirements during each year should be made Far enough in <br />advance to allow for topsoil salvage and redistribution to be carried out <br />during the summer and fall. Seeding and mulching operations should be <br />carried out in the late fall, to the extent possible, or in the spring, not <br />"from late fall to early spring" as is stated in the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.