My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12981
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:18 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:36:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/9/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE NEW PERMIT APPLICATION PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
JE STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jim Stover <br />August 9, 1996 -New App./Bowie 2 <br />Page 15 <br />date." BRL hired Morrison Knudsen (M-K) to address the geotechnical stability of the <br />proposed surface facility area of the Bowie No. 2 Mine. M-K, in turn, subcontracted with <br />Maxim Technologies, Inc., to complete a geotechnical investigation of the site. <br />The demonstration of long term geotechnical stability of the proposed reclaimed <br />configuration of the surface facilities will have to be thoroughly analyzed. Specific stability <br />analyses will have to be prepared for representative proposed reclaimed cut and fill <br />situations, including haul roads, conveyor corridors, and various facility benches, etc. <br />Appropriate material properties will have to be selected and justified for the anticipated <br />recLtimed site characteristics. This concern must be adequately addressed before any <br />decision can be proposed by the Division. <br />72) This response is generally acceptable. Please explain why permanent culverts are preferred <br />as opposed to some type of low water crossing. <br />2.05.4(2)(d) -Topsoil Redistribution <br />72a) The May 31, 1996 DMG letter references a stipulation and the probable stipulation contents. <br />Dces BRL agree with the statements contained in the May 31, 1996 DMG letter, and the <br />proposed range of redistributed topsoil depths? <br />2.05.4(2)(e) - Reve~etation Plan <br />73) Response accepted. Be advised that Yellow Sweetclover will not be counted as a desirable <br />plant in assessing reclamation success. <br />74) Response accepted. <br />75) Response accepted. <br />76) Response accepted. <br />2.05.4(2)(fl -Disposal of Debris. Acid-Forming and Toxic Forming Materials <br />77) Still awaiting additionally responses required from BRL. <br />2.05.4(2)(gJ - Drillholes <br />77a) Page 2.05-58 of the application provides reclamation detail for holes completed to non- <br />aquifers, and to artesian aquifers. Please specify the reclamation plans for holes in aquifers <br />which may not be artesian. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.