Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jim Stover <br />August 9, 1946 -New App./Bowie 2 <br />Page 14 <br />style stability analyses. <br />Subsequent to the Division's issuance of its adequacy comments for the Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />application, BRL submitted a "Preliminary Geotechnical Study" of the surface facilities area <br />performed by Maxim Technologies, Inc., as a subcontractor to Morrison Knudsen, Inc. <br />Having identified the proliferation of mass wasting problems throughout the proposed <br />surface facilities area, Maxim performed extensive boring, sample collection and laboratory <br />testing of materials at the site. Maxim characterized the general colluvial materials <br />encountered throughout the site as a "Lean Clay with Gravel (CL-GC)", observing that "the <br />majority of the overburden materials at this site can be described as a matrix of silty lean <br />clay supporting scattered to numerous fragments of sandstone." WF.STEC referred to the <br />corresponding colluvial cover on the processing refuse pile site as "the colluvial sandstone <br />above the Mancos Shale". <br />WF.STEC chose to convert from blow count observation conducted during penetration <br />sampling, using procedures outlined by Peck, et. al. (1974) and Lambe & Whitman (1969), <br />to deduce shear strength parameters (36° internal angle of friction and a cohesion of 0 psf') <br />for the completion of their stability analyses. In our experience, blow count conversions <br />can be suspect when penetration testing is performed on materials containing large fractions <br />of competent cobbles which resist penetration. Maxim, having completed 23 bore angering <br />program and sampling of the materials, chose to perform four triaxia] shear tests of the <br />"Lean Clay with Gravel". Maxim's test results determined that at least two different <br />material characters are manifested by this colluvial material, depending largely upon its clay <br />constituency and degree of hydration. Undrained, unconsolidated triaxial compression tests <br />performed on lower plasticity materials had an angle of intemal friction of 23 ° and an <br />apparent cohesion intercept of 2,200 psf. However, higher plasticity materials displayed <br />friction angles as low as 4° with an apparent cohesion of 3,050 psf. <br />Materials with strengths similar to these highly plastic colluvial Lean Clays with Gravel will <br />not result in acceptable SSF for the proposed refuse pile. Therefore, the Division continues <br />to request additional information to verify WESTEC's assumed strength parameters for the <br />'colluvial sandstone above the Mancos Shale". The material could be sampled and tested, <br />or Maxirn, if it examined the site, might be capable of rendering an opinion regarding the <br />relationship of the waste pile colluvium to the materials it tested in completing its study. <br />2.05.4 -Reclamation Plan <br />2.05.4(2)(c) - Backfilling and GradinE <br />71) In responding to concern H27, BRL stated; "Slope stability analysis of the reclaimed slope <br />will be performed based on the in progress M-K geotechnical study and submitted at a later <br />