My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12728
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12728
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:07 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/14/1980
Doc Name
LETTER TO RICHARD MILLS OF 05/08/80 PIT 3 TR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`, Mr. Geoffrey P~aunders <br />January 31, 1980 <br />Page 3 <br />(small holding ponds with no formal outlet works, spill- <br />way or embankment). These sumps are designed to capture <br />the sediment load and the entire 10-year storm runoff. <br />The problem with this plan is the eventual disposal of <br />the retained water. Several alternatives, Listed below, <br />should be investigated further with regard to the feasi- <br />bility and acceptance by the appropriate authorities. <br />A. Pump the captured water to a nearby diversion ditch <br />_. which would eventually drain to a sedimentation <br />pond. <br />B. After waiting a specified time period, pumping the <br />retained water to [he creek directly. <br />C. Regrade ar.d contour haul road to permit conveyance <br />of storm runoff across Middle Creek to the nearest <br />diversion ditch for appropriate disposal. <br />D. Attempt to construct appropriate outlet, spillway <br />and embankment facilities, to formalize the sump <br />areas into sediment ponds. <br />2. Ponds H and I, and both sumps are all preliminarily <br />located within approximately 100 feet of Middle Creek. <br />Aside from the discussion in Number 1 above, special <br />authorization may have [o be requested to construct <br />these facilities. <br />3. It is recommended that prior to finalization of ponds E, <br />F and G and their related ditches, detailed mapping be <br />prepared for these areas (1" = 200'). Included in Chis <br />mapping should be the establishment of an accurate cap- <br />acity table for the existing pond (Pond G). <br />4. As you are aware, several of these ponds will capture <br />runoff with severe water quality problems. EFC and LRCWE <br />will work together with you in developing appropriate <br />design parameters and alternatives for solving these <br />treatment problems. This relates particularly to Ponds <br />B, E, F and I but may include others. <br />Upon your review of this material, we would appreciate any <br />comments you or others associated with this project may deem <br />necessary. To maximize the efficiency of our engineering <br />efforts, we would also appreciate receiving your thoughts <br />regarding further scheduling and intermediate deadlines as <br />the permit application preparation proceeds. O~ir continuing <br />efforts at this time will be directed towards the following <br />work items: <br />~'(1 Leonar0 Rice Consulting Water Engineers.lnc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.