My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12443
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:30:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/31/1996
Doc Name
BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED BOWIE 2 MINE FN C-96-083 NEW PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J I ~ • • <br />J.E. Stover & Associates -36- May 31, 1996 <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />of the perennial springs and all surface runoff is appropriated. <br />Potential disruption of any of the water sources requires a plan <br />for augmentation approved by the water court. The experience of <br />the Mount Gunnison No. 1 mine presents precedent for the <br />resolution of these concerns. <br />2.4 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES <br />The preparer did not address stock watering ponds within this <br />section. The Division interprets 'structures' to include any and <br />all manmade structures, including water management devices, such <br />as ponds and irrigation ditches. The application contains <br />mitigation plans for the watering ponds. This deficiency can be <br />easily solved by including a brief discussion of stock watering <br />ponds and mitigative methods. <br />2.5 LANDSLIDES <br />As discussed under other geotechnical topics, the Division <br />believes the existence of historic and modern landslides within <br />the permit area constitutes a significant geotechnical concern <br />for the proposed Bowie #2 mine's operation and reclamation plan. <br />The preparer is correct in observing that no specific criteria <br />are available for the delineation of specific subsidence-related <br />landslide hazard increase. This topic is better addressed under <br />the specific sections relating to stability of the operating <br />facilities, such as roads and portal benches, and the reclamation <br />plan. <br />The Division does believe it would be appropriate to visually <br />inspect known historic and modern landslides, during the periods <br />immediately following retreat extraction in their immediate <br />proximity. The applicant should propose a detailed inspection <br />methodology to detect subsidence cracking or rejuvenation of <br />movement to the potentially effected landslides. This should <br />include inspection immediately following the annual ground water <br />high stand of late June, during which the majority of landslide <br />movement normally occurs. These inspections should be conducted <br />annually in areas undermined far an appropriate period of time <br />following retreat extraction, to verify negative impact from <br />subsidence. <br />4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Many of the preceding comments also apply to the reiterated <br />statements included by the preparer of Exhibit 15 within this <br />summary section of the report. <br />SUBSIDENCE HANDBOOK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.