My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12438
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12438
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/1982
Doc Name
DORCHESTER 1 MINE FN C-014-81 SECONDARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLR
To
DORCHESTER COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-s- <br />c. Monitoring of Effluent <br />d. Sediment Monitoring <br />- Sediment/sludge may need testing depending on type of coagulant <br />and method of disposal. These sediments may be toxic due to <br />the concentration of coagulant, or unsuitable due to colloids. <br />e. Operational Considerations <br />- rf discharge will continue after close of mine, the company <br />must commit to treating as long as requited, Under Section <br />(9.05,2(2)), the facilities must be maintained until either the <br />discharge continuously meets effluent limitations without treat- <br />ment, or until the discharge has permanently ceased. <br />B. Impoundments <br />1. From Pfap DOB-6-GTL-I, it appears that road drainage is proposed to <br />be routed to a 'catchment basin' or impoundment along the county road. <br />Zf water is indeed being impounded, Rule (4.05.9) must be addressed. <br />In addition, the Division must assess whether this basin will affect <br />the public road. The following items should be addressed: <br />a. Cross-sections of the county road and basin must be provided. <br />b. Basin volume estimates must be submitted. <br />c. Sediment storage volumes and a discussion of sediment removal <br />methods and levels must be provided. <br />d. What measures will be taken to prevent erosion and fill satur- <br />ation of the road? <br />e <br />e. Will this structure affect the public road stability? <br />f. Has approval from the county been obtained? <br />g. What design event will the structure handle? <br />h. What will happen if this design event is exceeded? <br />i. How and when will this structure be removed? <br />~ 2. Please note: The impoundments within the Ifastings lease need not <br />be addressed at this time. Even though these areas are within the <br />Dorchester permit boundary, reclamation responsibilities have not yet <br />been transferred. <br />3. Ponds N2 and N3, as shown on the Water Routing diagrams in the <br />response, appear to be temporary impoundments. Therefore, Rule <br />(4. 05.9(I)(eJ) must be addressed for each pond. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.