Laserfiche WebLink
-~- <br />C. Diversions ~3nd Conveyances of Overland Flow. <br />The regulations address two types of diversions and conveyances; Those <br />having a drainage area of more than one square mile, Rule (4.05.9) and <br />those having a drainage area of less than one square mile. 1'he second <br />demarcation in the Regulations is if the diversion is permanent or temporary. <br />1. A]agpie Creek Diversion <br />The Magpie Creek Diversion has a drainage of more than one square <br />mile. Dorchester Coal Company requested that the diversion be permanent. <br />If the request to leave the diversion permanently is to be approved, the <br />following concerns must be resolved: <br />a. Probable Hydrologic Consequences - The applicant must provide a <br />quantitative discussion assessing the probable hydrologic consequences <br />of leaving the Pfagpie Creek diversion as a permanent diversion. <br />This assessment is necessary for the Division to find that the <br />operation is designed to prevent material damage outside the permit <br />area. Since the most likely effect would be increased erosion in <br />the unnamed tributary to Flagpie Creek which receives the flow, the <br />extent, magnitude, and consequences of this erosion should be <br />assessed. This erosion could effect thestability of G.E.C. Minerals' <br />segment of the diversion. (The effect could be reduced or eliminated <br />by enlarging the natural channel to pass the increased flow.) <br />b. Capability of the diversion to transport the supplied sediment <br />load. - The Magpie Creek diversion is constructed at gradients lower <br />than those in the natural channel, and as a result, would likely <br />be unable to transport the natural sediment loads of the basin. The <br />diversion may, therefore, be subject to siltation which would reduce <br />channel capacity and, without maintenance, may make the diversion non- <br />functional. ~(In addition, Rule (9.05.9(6)) would require that the <br />diversion be capable of transporting natural sediment loads.) <br />If the diversion is to be left following reclamation, the <br />applicant should technically demonstrate that the diversion can pass <br />the runoff and sediment supplied by the basin above without erosion <br />or deposition. <br />c. Side slope stability - The diversion is cut into the base of a <br />steep hi11s1ope and the stability of the hillslope may be affected. <br />Landslides would reduce channel capacity. <br />The Division will require that the applicant demonstrate that <br />the side slopes of the diversion will have a static safety factor <br />of 1.3, utilizing current prudent state-of-the-art geotechnical <br />analyses. <br />