My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12438
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12438
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:52 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/1982
Doc Name
DORCHESTER 1 MINE FN C-014-81 SECONDARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLR
To
DORCHESTER COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-~- <br />C. Diversions ~3nd Conveyances of Overland Flow. <br />The regulations address two types of diversions and conveyances; Those <br />having a drainage area of more than one square mile, Rule (4.05.9) and <br />those having a drainage area of less than one square mile. 1'he second <br />demarcation in the Regulations is if the diversion is permanent or temporary. <br />1. A]agpie Creek Diversion <br />The Magpie Creek Diversion has a drainage of more than one square <br />mile. Dorchester Coal Company requested that the diversion be permanent. <br />If the request to leave the diversion permanently is to be approved, the <br />following concerns must be resolved: <br />a. Probable Hydrologic Consequences - The applicant must provide a <br />quantitative discussion assessing the probable hydrologic consequences <br />of leaving the Pfagpie Creek diversion as a permanent diversion. <br />This assessment is necessary for the Division to find that the <br />operation is designed to prevent material damage outside the permit <br />area. Since the most likely effect would be increased erosion in <br />the unnamed tributary to Flagpie Creek which receives the flow, the <br />extent, magnitude, and consequences of this erosion should be <br />assessed. This erosion could effect thestability of G.E.C. Minerals' <br />segment of the diversion. (The effect could be reduced or eliminated <br />by enlarging the natural channel to pass the increased flow.) <br />b. Capability of the diversion to transport the supplied sediment <br />load. - The Magpie Creek diversion is constructed at gradients lower <br />than those in the natural channel, and as a result, would likely <br />be unable to transport the natural sediment loads of the basin. The <br />diversion may, therefore, be subject to siltation which would reduce <br />channel capacity and, without maintenance, may make the diversion non- <br />functional. ~(In addition, Rule (9.05.9(6)) would require that the <br />diversion be capable of transporting natural sediment loads.) <br />If the diversion is to be left following reclamation, the <br />applicant should technically demonstrate that the diversion can pass <br />the runoff and sediment supplied by the basin above without erosion <br />or deposition. <br />c. Side slope stability - The diversion is cut into the base of a <br />steep hi11s1ope and the stability of the hillslope may be affected. <br />Landslides would reduce channel capacity. <br />The Division will require that the applicant demonstrate that <br />the side slopes of the diversion will have a static safety factor <br />of 1.3, utilizing current prudent state-of-the-art geotechnical <br />analyses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.