Laserfiche WebLink
-10- <br />d. Engineering design - The diversion must be designed by or under <br />the supervision of a qualified registered professional engineer. The <br />applicant has previously submitted a map showing the location of <br />the diversion, Hydrology Ifap, sheet 2 of the response, a longitudinal <br />channel cross-sections for the 100-year design flood as calculated <br />by the G.E.C, SOAP contractor (submi.tted PSarch 22, 1982). This <br />information should be assembled into a detail plan, and certified <br />by a cualified registered professional engineer as required under <br />Rule (2.05.3(4)). <br />The plan should describe the transition from the natural drainage <br />to the diversion channel. This point should be clearly identified <br />on the plan view and channel profile (sheet 4). The applicant should <br />show how flows are diverted from the natural channel into the diver- <br />sion. Provide design details for any structures used. <br />For each segment of diversion channel, the applicant should provide <br />the flow velocity, identify the material into which the channel is <br />excavated, and identify when channel protection would be required. <br />The applicant should show on the plan view and in profile (sheet 4) <br />all areas where riprap is used. The applicant should provide discussia <br />and calculations showing riprap sizing, gradation of the riprap, <br />nature of the filter blanket used, method of emplacement, and the <br />method used to determine durability. <br />An unnamed tributary enters the permanent d_'ve rsion at station Ff <br />on the profile. The applicant should show all modifications to the <br />tributary and the diversion to accommodate this confluence. (The <br />tributary is much steeper than the diversion channel. Would the <br />break in slope cause a fan to form at the mouth of the tributary?) <br />e. Responsibility for~the inlet and outlet portions for the <br />Diversion - Upstream, the culvert under County Road 92, is undersized <br />and does riot meet performance standards. It is. uncertain who <br />is responsible for the culvert. If the culvert is installed in an <br />undisturbed portion of the stream, it is the county's responsibility <br />and we would have no jurisdiction. If, however, the culvert was <br />installed when the channel was realigned for the Magpie Creek diver- <br />sion, Dorchester should install a culvert sufficient to pass the <br />100-year event. Responsibility for the culvert must be confirmed. <br />If the culvert is the responsibility of Dorchester, designs to meet <br />the performance standards of Rule (4.05.3). <br />Do~,mstream,~ the diversion passes through G,E .C.'s permit area. <br />i The riprap in this section has only been sized for the 10-year, <br />24-hour event. Therefore, after G.E.C. reclaims its property, will <br />Dorchester reconstruct this portion of the diversion to meet the <br />permanent standards? <br />2. Diversions Around the [9aste Pile <br />Diversions around the waste pile will drain areas of Less than one <br />square mile and must be permanent. Attachment I, Figure 8 of the <br />original application, has calculations fora diversion, but the location <br />could not be determined. All waste Wile diversions must be revised and <br />must meet t-he requirements of Rule (4.05.3). <br />