Laserfiche WebLink
hoist and Dry Consistcn~: Ratings <br />for these parameters appear to have <br />been taken from the Typical Profile <br />Descriptions Volu.-ne 11. All soils <br />rate good to .air. <br />9. Soil Nutrients: Soil analyzed for nitrate, <br />nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassiu.-~ <br />Caere: i•]inevada-Splitro complex, <br />Skylic~;, Abor, ?.aberg, Sky-,;ay, ?putt, <br />Gapo, Buc~;st;in, Buckley, and Unna.-aed- <br />Cochetopa. <br />10. *Iicronutrien*_s: Iron (Fe), :~fa, Cu, Zn, Pb, <br />Cd, Hg, As, Se, and Cto were analyzed <br />on Aaberg silty clay and ~Iinevada- <br />Splitro complex, from Eckman Park. <br />Iron and Zn were analyzed on soils <br />obtained from the "Borrow Area". <br />Soils analyzed were not deficient in <br />any nutrients nor were toxic levels <br />of any elements present. :~o soil <br />amendments are planned. Soil sat:pl- <br />ing and testing to determine the <br />nutrient status of the plant groc;th <br />media after topsoil redistribution is <br />planned. As stated in the `IItP, top- <br />soil and subsoil depths were deter- <br />rlined by field corin£; however, no <br />data presenting profile descriptions <br />derived by Energy Fuels field coring <br />is submitted. T~•pical SCS soil <br />profile descriptions are submitted <br />(Volume 11) but topsoil and subsoil <br />depths given in Table 95a do not <br />correspond with the horizon depths <br />in the~Soil Profile Descriptions. <br />Topsoil and subsoils appear to nave <br />been combined for several soil units. <br />Acres of soil to be removed in each mapping unit are <br />given in Table 95. Volumes of topsoil and subsoil <br />have been calculated correctly according to the <br />areas given in Table 95 and the depths Qiven in <br />Table 95a. <br />Topsoil will be removed approximately six months in <br />advance of mining activities. Before soils are <br />stripped, vegetation (e.g., ~.spen, Oak brush, and <br />other large shrubs) will be removed. <br />