My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12155
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:30 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:27:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/23/1981
Doc Name
BLUR RIBBON MINE PERMIT APPLICATION FN C-047-81
From
MLR
To
SUNFLOWER ENERGY CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~, . <br />Five • <br />• <br />information is easily obtained from D.O.W. and needs to be incorporated <br />into the Fish and Wildlife Resources section of the application. <br />A surveyed list of existing species must be provided. Any known <br />threatened or endangered species occurring in or near the permit <br />area should be mentioned. <br />A discussion of whether any migration routes are present in the area <br />must be submitted. <br />A map showing migratory routes, winter ranges, monitoring stations, <br />and mitigation facilities must be provided. <br />It is stated that a golden eagle nests in the area. The nest site <br />and feeding areas must be identified in relation to the proposed mine <br />facilities. <br />Reports included by Fowler (Environmental Scientist) and Alexander <br />(USFS) are contradictory with regard to description of habitat. One <br />report characterized the permit area as mountain shrub (oakbrush and <br />service-berry) while the other describes the area as semi-desert <br />(yucca, grams, cactus, etc.) with an overstory of pinyon-juniper. <br />This discrepancy needs to be clarified. <br />One report and a letter from the Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />classifies the area a critical elk and mule deer winter range, while <br />another letter states that the permit area is not classed as key <br />winter game range. These statements must be clarified. <br />The Division of Wildlife fisheries study (Exhibit R) was not included <br />in the Mine Plan and should be submitted. <br />Provide a statement as to how the fish and wildlife plan will minimize <br />disturbances and adverse impacts on fish and wildlife and related en- <br />vironmental factors. Include a discussion of the adequacy of the re- <br />vegetation plan with respect to providing habitat and palatable food <br />resources for wildlife. <br />If an active golden eagle and/or bald eagle nest is likely to be <br />impacted by the proposed mining activity, then impact control measures <br />should be identified to protect the nesting activity. <br />If the permit area is within critical elk and mule deer range, then <br />impact control measures should be discussed and employed to limit re- <br />lated impacts. <br />Maps and Plans <br />Provide elevations and locations of required water quality and quantity, <br />fish and wildlife, and air quality monitoring stations. <br />Locations of proposed water wells and depths must be submitted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.