My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11847
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:32:10 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/15/1982
Doc Name
2ND ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLR
To
SUNLAND MINING CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dave Canning <br />Page Three . <br />April 15, 1982 <br />submitted which contains 1) the inflow source; 2) a measure- <br />ment or estimate of inflows (i.e. "X" gpm, "X" gpd, dripping, etc.); <br />and 3) pH, electro-conductivity and temperature of measurable <br />inflows (e.g, greater than 1 gpm). The mine inflaa study should <br />also include a description of the character of different types <br />of inflows encountered during mining (i.e. fluctuates seasonally, <br />flows at a constant rate, dries up with the advancement of mine <br />working, etc.). <br />3. No spring or well survey has been submitted for the area most <br />likely to be impacted by mining,a portion of the Middle Creek <br />drainage basin downdip of the mine as represented on Attachment <br />B. <br />a. A preliminary spring and well survey must be submitted <br />prior to permit approval. The survey will include <br />a water rights investigation for wells and springs <br />which specifies yield, use, well depth and potential <br />sources of the water for the area delineated in Attachment D. <br />b.• Sunland Coal Company should also commit, within the permit <br />application, to a field survey of the above mentioned <br />area. The spring field survey should consist of 1) <br />mapping of all springs;2) measuring field parameters of flow, <br />pH, electroconductivity and temperature; 3) a description <br />of the spring source; and 4) the percentage of flow contributed <br />by springs in this area to the flow of Middle Creek. <br />4. As discussed in the previous three comments, the permit applica- <br />tion did not evaluate the probable hydrologic consequences <br />of mining to the quanity and quality of water in Middle Creek. <br />The Division bases its concern on the information presented <br />by the consulting firm 4Jater, Waste and Land in the permit <br />application. The consulting firm describes the piezometric <br />surface as being equivalent to stream levels throughout <br />the general area because of the hydrolic conductivity <br />of the faults. One recharge source for the faults is Trout <br />Creek. Therefore the Division concludes, mining of coal below <br />the elevation of Trout Creek has a high probability of re- <br />ducing groundwater discharges downdip of the mine within the <br />Middle Creek drainage area. The probable hydrolic consequences <br />of mining section of the permit applciation must be rewritten <br />to address the concerns expressed in this letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.