My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11529
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:54 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:20:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
5/18/1981
Doc Name
DORCHESTER 1 PAR ROADS
From
MLR
To
CAROL RUSSELL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />' Memo to Carol Russell <br />May 18, 1981 <br />Page 2 <br />2. The elevations listed on the Y axis of the road profile do not correspond <br />to elevations on base maps. The inaccuracy of this profile will make it impossible <br />to verify compliance with 4.03.1. The; applicant should submit a new, certified <br />profile at a Iarger scale that uses elevations from surveyors field notes (or <br />from some other accurate source). The profile should indicate the location of <br />culverts to verify the amount of fill material to be placed over them. The <br />profile should also show the original profile to enable the Division to assess <br />cut slope lengths. To verify grade measurements, the applicant should indicate <br />lengths and grades (and the points used in the measurement) on this profile. <br />3. The applicant must certify the road cross-section drawing as required in 2.10. <br />4. The applicant must show the location and slope of the steepest cutslopes to <br />be used on the haul road. Cut slopes must be in compliance with 9.03.1(3)(c). <br />5. The applicant must present evidence to support compliance with 4.03.1(3)(d) <br />concerning embankments placed on side slopes exceeding 20~, stability safety <br />factors, and embankment slopes. The applicant states that roads comply with <br />AASXYO highway recommendations, but does not submit evidence to verify this. <br />4.03.1(4) - Drainage - Roads <br />The drainage control system for the haul road has not been adequately addressed <br />to verify compliance with 4.03.1(4). <br />1. During refuse pile construction, how will the haul road cross the refuse <br />pile perimeter ditch? if a culvert is to be used, the applicant must submit the <br />designs for this culvert. <br />2. What measures will be used to prevent refuse pile drainage from flowing onto <br />the road and into the road ditch? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.