Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Y.en Schlagel <br />Paye -2- <br />August 31, 1979 <br /> <br />will be necessary at the time federal coal is to he mined. The pillar <br />extraction plan is helpful but some indication of the overall sequance <br />of mining is needed on the mine layout map. !Jhat is the overall plan <br />Wing of attack for the fee coal acid o-rhat is the direction of mining? You <br />quince have incorrectly tabled the Mining Plan flap Exhibit D. All surface <br />facilities should be labeled on this map. A coal stockpile is not <br />provided on the bench nor is a refuse disposal area. <br />Exhibit D Ilininq Plan <br />oper References are made to the P,egional Director and Mining Supervisor bu[ <br />thorn y not to the Mined Land Recl~nnation Division as the proper authorities <br /> to receive reports of accidents and major mining problems. The Division <br /> should be notified as well. <br />deral Developm~-nt of the federal lease tract is mentioned in this mining plan. <br />al This is irrelevant to the mining plan for vrhich approval is sought. A- <br /> gain some mention ip this narrative about the plan of attack for re- <br /> moving fee coal should be provided. The plan should be coherant and <br /> loyical vrith no assumption~f future mining in federal coal. If approval <br /> is gained for the federal1lease it o-rill be a simple matter to insert <br /> a revised mining plan (in the forthcoming 3 ring binder). USGS will <br /> not approve your mining plan, given the absence of federal coal. Have <br /> you received 11SFIA approval for your roof bolting plan and ventilation <br /> scheme? <br />~sidence The hlined Land Reclamation Division will not determine the suhsidence <br /> monitoring system or control plan. These facets of the mining plan <br /> should be included in the mining plan for review and approval by the <br /> Division. The major concerns related to subsidence. are disruption <br /> of prc;sent or future surface land uses and interruption of subsurface <br /> flo•,.rs. A discussion of possible impacts on surface land uses should <br /> be provided. Please justify the statement that "subsidence afn~uch as <br /> two inches may he expected" (in areas not supported by barrier pillars). <br /> 1Jhat geologic data indicates "no aquifers exist in the stratigrapl~y <br /> above the E seam? Please, provide this data. <br />logic Mud flows r-rould seem to pose a rather substantial geologic hazzard to <br />cards the surface configuration and portal stability at the Blue Ribbon <br /> Mine. There is already evidence of ground movement above the liigh- <br /> wall. What provisions will be made to monitor ground movement at [he <br /> mine site and to prevent a mud florr~~ienc~r area which could be disastrous <br /> to the environment. <br /> Exhibit E P,eclamation Plan <br />gh Station Th=_ weigh.station area may have been previously disturbed but reuse by <br /> Sunflaver' Eneryy will necessitate site reclamarior.. The area should be <br /> scarified to a depth of 2 feet to provide a root zone for plants. The <br /> area should be revegetated ~•rith a seed mixture specifically appropriate <br /> for the site. <br />Bch Area Greater Detail should be supplied regarding the recreation of a stable <br /> hillslope in the higl~rrall backfilliny operation. Issues of proper <br /> compaction and surface and subsurFace drainage restoration need to be <br /> discussed. Specific plans should be provided. The uppermost layer of <br />(cont'd) <br />