My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR11391
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR11391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:19:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/29/1997
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-96-084 RESPONSE TO PERMIT APPLICATION ADEQUACY LETTER 2 DATED JULY 2 1997
From
GREYSTONE
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Kent Gorham <br />July 26, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br />84. P3 Portal Pond and 611 pond designs <br /> <br />a. Pond 006 has been re-run to move more water into the west end of the pond. <br />b. Exhibit 15-14 has been revised to reflect the volume and construction designs for Pond <br />006. <br />85. LCC accepts a stipulation on the issues identified in question 85. <br />90. LCC is now planning [o replace topsoil throughout the Jeff Canyon surface mine. Coarse <br />fragments from the use of overburden as a plant growth medium should not pose a problem. <br />In the unlikely event that there is excess topsoil, it will be distributed in azeas identified as <br />needing topsoil. Language has been put into 2.05-59a. <br />91. LCC would like to take a phased approach to the geotechnical investigation of the fills at the <br />Jeff Canyon surface mine. This would expedite mining in the first two yeazs of the <br />operation, minimize disturbances in the eastern portions of the Jeff Canyon Mine to ensure <br />proof-of-concept and allow LCC and the Division to identify patterns and relationships in <br />the azea which might lead to a more focused and efficient investigations in the future. <br />Phased investigations were previously discussed between Mazk Gray and Jim Pendleton, and <br />LCC was of the understanding that this would be acceptable. The purpose of providing the <br />methodology was to obtain approval from the Division's engineer of the protocol such that <br />the future, stipulated submittal would be applicable to meet the requirements of Rules <br />2.05.3(6)(b) and (c) and 4.09 at Fills 1 through 4. Is there a way to structure the stipulation <br />to allow phased geotechnical investigations? <br />98(c). Page 2.05-37a has been modified to reflect the correct map, 2.03.3-4. <br />102. LCC will request that Picketwire to modify the New Elk permit to permit the disposal of <br />Lorencito refuse at the New Elk disposal site. <br />103. LCC has requested a stipulation to cover the geotechnical issues at the site. <br />110. LCC will provide the applicable air permits as they aze finalized. <br />111. LCC accepts a stipulation to develop a shrub reclamation plan. <br />114. LCC will provide joint approval documents from the CDMG Mine Safety and Training <br />Program and MSHA to perform concurrent surface and underground coal mining activities <br />when it is available, and accepts the stipulation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.