Laserfiche WebLink
Payz 1:'-i4•'+ states that she proposed ne:•r office/shop complex nas Geen <br />tantativ~l.y located as sho~,i~ on 11ap iV-,?, but that it nay be relocated. <br />Until a rival location is detier~uined L•y Gupire, the Division cannot <br />approve of the proposed complex's sediment control system. Ea;pira shall <br />have the complex approved through the revisicn process. <br />Several discrepancies were noted wiur the maps that need to be corrected. <br />Structure fliap IV-L shall delete pond 9-P9 that has been removed, and <br />include any new features proposed, such as the fresh water injection v,ell <br />and, pipeline from pond J-PL. I.1ap IV-y should delete diCch 5-G11. In <br />general, the maps shall be updated t~~ represent existing conditions and <br />changes approved by revisions. <br />>;1V. CnCKY=11_LIIJG 11fJU GkAUING - klJl_I:S L.US..;(b), Z.U5.4(Z)(a), Z.u;,.4([)(c), <br />4.ug, 4.13 and 4.14 <br />CK I T I CtiL CU?iCEItNS - <br />All ~te:.s ~in this seciion are critical concerns since they are necessary <br />to dete~•nin.e the bond amount. <br />kulc: Z.Ub.ll requires a plan/schedule for backfilliny and grading in <br />sufficient detail to allow the Division to evaluate the feasibility of tr,e <br />pr°oposed post-mining topography and t'ne required bond estimate. in order <br />to completely define the projected movement of overburden rnater'•ial within; <br />the proposed mining operation, Empirr. Energy Corporation must farther <br />detail ore quantities of material to be moved, the location of .'ne <br />material and show the approximate distance of movement. In other 'r:Ords, <br />mass balance calculations roust be made. <br />Page IV-73 states that, "Each of the portals will have a (reclamation) <br />plan developed for each speciFic portal area." The Division agrees wit~r <br />this approac'n, but t'ne plans must be provided in the permit. <br />The first rortal area, the No. 5 portal, is discussed in the application <br />on page IV-73, ;rirere it is stated that concrete from the silo will be used <br />ror uackfilling. On page IV-7&, tf~e plan also provides For additiona] <br />backfill ~uaterial from the track grade. The volumes of the area to ue <br />fillet and the volumes of the materials to be used For uackfilling mist be <br />provided fcr the 'do. 5 portal. <br />In like manner, volunietrics have not Deco i,ruvided ror the No. 5h portal <br />uackfilling operation. The application only states, on page iV-7S, that <br />old spoil rr.aterial '.vill be utilized. i`lass balance calculations and push <br />ur t,z,a ,iistar,,;es •,.ust Lc- provided fur t'r.e reclamation operation at tare <br />i.J. 5r+ pc rtd~. <br />'r aye I'.-73 Of t'ne application 4150 Says that portals iJO. g dGd i~0. `)~~+ LdVe <br />overburden materials stockpiled fur final reclamation use. The :Mass <br />balance of the backfilliny operations for these portals and for the :~o. 9 <br />portal exl:er~sion described on page I`1-70 must be provided. Tree ezpansinn <br />plan for the No. 9 portal explains that "approximately 250,000 cubic ',sic) <br />yards of material will be excavate)". Swell factors shoulrJ be usco in tl,e <br />mass balance calculations For the No. 9 portal extension. <br />