APPCOR11230 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Tnc apalicant has pion?osed t~,~o loca~ions fora .Vo. 9 mine con~~e,or line i~; the a:nenuuc: application. lnsufficirnt infot7nation ,vas proviuad ror dither location w show how the conveyor ,v~ll prevent da~nayd Lo Lhu envirun~nent and to puulic and private property. both routes would pass over the Williams Fork River, over State liiyl,way 13/7fly, over the rail line, over t';;u sedi~aent ponds and tirrouyh or o+rer three topsoil stockpiles. Tne Division cannot approve the fVo. 9 rn~ne conveyor line. A technical revision to the permit shah ue submitted prior to construction of a iJo. 9 mine conveyor line. Problems ~.vere noted with the mine facilities and coal handliny structures sactions as follows: (a). plan [V-9 shows a sLOraye I:ank tired in the southeast portion uF Lhe disturDe~l area which i, not IucaLed uii Plap lV-Z, iwr i~ iL described in the text; (ul, I-yap IV-9 also sho~;rs a sCOraye ~noyazine .rliich is not descriued in the text; (c). The rotary oreaker station, described on page IV-21 and Dr•awinys l1'-1 Chrouyh 1V-!,, is not located on Lhe facilities maps (i'a-[ or 1V-y); grid (d). Un pages IV-21 and IV-22, Drawing IV-1 is referencec many times. There is no Drawiny iV-1 in the application cn file. Rule 2.0'.i.3(3)(a) r4ine Facilities, references Rule 2.1U ~+hich requires t'nat all facilities maps must be prepared and certified by a qualified reyistered professional. Tne facilities maps have not been updated since tney were certified. All maps in the amended application must oe current and reflect all charges that have occurred duriny the review, process. The text and maps which reference existiny mining facilities ~uust be revised to be consistent with each other and must accurately represent what is on the yround. The maps must be certified by a qualified reyistered professional as required by Rule 2.10. A. Roads STIPULATIUfVS - These concerns could Dc; stipulated as conditions to Lhe lier~nit. Page IV-47 of the application contains a brief discussion of road information. Tne discussion states that the mine roads do not n~e2t the design ,;r'iteria of Mule 4.0:;, but that since they are existing r-oacs, they are exe;,pt fre~~ the design criteria. Ouriny the revie~~+ process empire _GC r7~ .:d rporat ion de~nonst ratea compliance :;itn Rule 4.03 ~.;nicn is prasente., in „pncndices 1V-h and IV-12, Dra:riny IV-12, and flaps IV-9 and IV-iU. 'ne operator shall, therefore, revise the road discussion cn pay' !v-~,7 to-reference the designs suun;itted elseo-;here in the application.