Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. A detailed geologic map of the area proposed to be permitted is <br />needed which delineates alI coal outcrop Lines, faulting in the permit <br />area with the approximate amount of displacement, and major fracture <br />zones, especially those cutting the major sandstone units (2.04.6[2](a](iiiJ). <br />2. A detailed stratigraphic section from the surface down to the aquifer <br />below the lowest coal seam to be mined must be submitted. This <br />section should include all coal seams and all aquifers as manifested <br />in the permit area. (2.04.6 (2J(a](iv]), <br />3. The applicant must provide all lithologic logs used in compiling the <br />cross-sections in Drawing III-l. A discrepancy exists as to the <br />elevation of the "Middle"Sandstone above the F seam. In the cross- <br />section it is shown to be 200' above the F seam, but in the technical <br />review of subsidence it is said to be within 50'. The applicant <br />should clarify this discrepancy. Additionally, the elevations where <br />water was encountered must be indicated on each Zithologic log. <br />9. Conventionally, geological sampling of rock units (i.e., roof, floor, <br />interburden and coal) for physical and chemical charateristics have <br />been conducted on a minimum of one core per square mile of affected <br />area to determine variance and distribution of toxic, acid or <br />alkaline forming substances. The data supplied bu Empire Energy is <br />insufficient to analyze the variability of toxic or alkaline producing <br />substances within the permit area due to the size of the proposed <br />permit area and complex geology. Additional analyses need to be run <br />on roof, floor, interburden and coal samples for each seam to be <br />mined. These samples should be obtained from cores spaced at one <br />core per square mile and should be analyzed according to the list <br />provided in Attachment A. (2.04.6 [2J[a](iv](C&D]) <br />In some cases, given local environmental conditions, not all of the <br />parameters Listed on Attachment A will be required. Should the <br />applicant feel that adequate information has been obtained from <br />on-site data collection or another substantiated source to indicate <br />that a parameter or parameters do not warrant testing, then a <br />thorough analytical discussion related directly to the specific <br />characteristics of the mine should be included in the application. <br />5. The sulfur analysis of coal is incomplete, In addition to total <br />sulfur, the Division requires per cent pyritic sulfur, per cent <br />organic sulfur and per cent sulfate sulfur. These compounds are a <br />concern because they are potentially acid and alkaline forming <br />materials (2.09.6[2][aJ). <br />2.09.7 Hydrology Description <br />(1) Groundwater Information, <br />1. Five aquifers are mentioned in the permit application; t17e Tampa <br />River Alluvium, the Williams Fork Alluvium, the "Middle" Sandstone, <br />the Twenty Mile Sandstone and t/~e Trout Creek Sandstone. Only one of <br />the aquifers, the [dilliams Fork Alluvium, has adequate monitoring wells <br />located in the aquifer to access the baseline hydroloyic conditions and <br />the affects of mining on the hydrologic balance of this aquifer. <br />