Laserfiche WebLink
.;~ <br />Page 2 <br />Mr. Schissler <br />April 28, 1981 <br />The Craig laodout facility constitutes another concern. Empire Energy <br />Corporation has not provided enough information to adequately review this <br />facility. This discussion highlights the major concerns of the application. <br />A discussion of each is included in this report. Each item requires a <br />specific written finding to be made by the Division prior to permit <br />approval. <br />RI1 responses to deficiencies in this review process should be presented <br />as revisions to the existing application, not as additional submissions. <br />In order that the final document will remain as comprehensive and concise <br />as possible, all revisions should be prepared in a manner that will <br />facilitate their insertion in the application to replace the revised <br />materials. This must be done for all 12 volumes (MLR-5, OSM-7). <br />Zn order that we may have adequate time to review responses submitted <br />by Empire Energy Corporation and incorporate tl~e results of this review <br />into the written findings which must be prepared as part of the decision <br />process, it is essential that Empire Energy Corporation respond as <br />expeditiously as possible to the concerns raised in t1v s letter. <br />I suggest that representatives of Empire Energy Corporation schedule a <br />meeting with the Division to discuss t1~e comments in this letter. If <br />you have any questions regarding this review, please contact either <br />Ed Bischoff or myself. <br />Si~erely, <br />`Sa a <br />Rec1e <br />/k <br />CC: P. Wolf <br />K. Kirk <br />