My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC39613
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC39613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:44:11 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 11:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
10/7/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Area 5 rs a large area on gently sloping ground that had contained eleven separated <br />drillholes; it was reseeded in the period 27-31 August, 2001. The locations of the drillholes <br />were marked on the surface with brass caps. The regrading was very good. Small islands of <br />original vegetation were left in place when the site was originally excavated. With these in <br />place. MCC was able to grade the disturbed area back into the original topography as closely <br />as possible. Area 5 contained a slight drainage Swale that had been returned to its original <br />configuration Straw bales placed in the swale as sediment control had been spread around <br />and rendered ineffective in just one day by cattle on the site. In numerous inspections, no <br />erosion has ever been noted, nor any sediment transport off the disturbed area- Thrs area, <br />because of the heavy grazing, must be evaluated to assess the effectiveness of the <br />vegetation to provide sediment control without additional devices. <br />Photo. <br />The area designated as Area 6 sits off to the side of the main road corridor into the thermal <br />event disturbed area The area, sitting on a steep east-facing slope, contained one drillhole, <br />the location of which was marked The regrading was fine. blending the area into the original <br />topography. Vegetation was reasonable, but a demonstration will be needed if MCC plans to <br />manage the area without alternative sediment controls. (No photo.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.