Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />(Page 4) <br /> <br />MINE ID X OR PROSPECTING ID k M-77-300 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9/22/99 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />4 to 6 inches topsoil, this area will undergo seedbed preparation and will be re~~egetated using the <br />plant species listed in this exhibit. <br />Since these statements in the reclamation plan cannot be readily applied to the reclamation of the <br />parking lot fill that slopes down to the creek, reclamation of this outslope should be specifically <br />addressed. The technical revision should also include a statement that any oil cw~taminated soil in <br />the parking lot will be collected and properly disposed of off-site or analyz ecl and shown to be <br />suitable for onsite disposal. <br />2. It is likely that the access road up Ralston Creek will remain in some form in the reclaimed area. <br />Through portions of the mine site the road is immediately adjacent to the creek and limits the <br />development of the riparian area to the creek bank. It was agreed that during zeclartation Cotter would <br />relocate the road to the west where feasible and establish vegetation on the overb~cnk where the road <br />is currently located. In particular, the reach from the guard shack location to the parking lot would <br />benefit from the implementation of such a plan, and the road relocation could be easily accomplished. <br />The west and east mine dumps were inspected. The proposal included in technical revision TR-09 for <br />dump reclamation is to eliminate the riprap requirement specified in the 1983 reclamation plan and to <br />relocate dump rock from the north ends of the east and west piles. The rationale f:or this change is <br />based on the waste rock pile footprints being much smaller today than was envisioned in the 1983 plan. <br />A1[hough Cotter is currently mining and shipping ore from the Schwartzwalder Mine, the ore sorter that <br />produced reject rock comprising about 50 percenC of the material delivered to the dumps has been <br />decommissioned. Under the current and near term mining plan, no additional development rock will be <br />placed on the dumps. If the dumps will be enlarged in the future, Cotter will revi:;e the reclamation <br />plan accordingly (see letter from Cotter Corporation dated June 19, 1999 in TR-04 f.ile). By removing <br />the north end of the dumps, the configurations proposed in the TR-04 application wi1L not erode during <br />a 50-year flood on Ralston Creek. The Division's adequacy letter dated May 19, 1999 requires a <br />demonstration or revised design demonstrating dump stability during the 100-year f7 ood. <br />The following observations were made during the inspection of the dumps. <br />• The west dump outslope is at the angle of repose, and the north lobe of the dumF~ has not yet been <br />relocated. The approximate section of the dump to be removed under the TR-04 Flan was described <br />by Cotter personnel, and the mechanics of earthmoving necessary to cut the outslope of the dump to <br />2:1 were discussed. <br />• The reclamation grading work on the east dump has been largely completed. The north tip of the dump <br />has been removed to the lines and grade specified in the TR-04 application. The area from which <br />the waste rock has been removed has not yet been seeded. Most of the dump outsl o)~e has been graded <br />to 2:1. There is an access bench cut into the approximate vertical center of the east dump <br />outslope. The configuration of this bench in the final reclaimed topography was discussed. It is <br />the Division's opinion that the bench should remain as it will enhance the bulk stability of the <br />dump by reducing the overall outslope angle and will reduce the flow path of any r~~noff flowing down <br />the dump face. The bench should be graded to carry water off the dump to the north and south, with <br />a divide in the center. It should be noted that the reclamation plan approved in 1983 encouraged <br />the establishment of terraces in the dump outslopes where feasible. <br />• An access road along the interior edge of the dump was inspected. This road may remain in an <br />appropriately modified form in the reclaimed topography. The road will provide access to the top <br />of the dump for revegetation monitoring and maintenance and for rill and gully maintenance. The <br />road will also provide access to the east dump energy dissipater discussed below f:or inspection and <br />maintenance. To remain as a reclaimed feature, the road cuts must be graded to 2:1 and <br />appropriately sized and spaced water bars installed. Once the dump revegetation work is completed, <br />the road should be topsoiled and seeded, and once the access to the top of the jump is no longer <br />needed, the road should be disabled through placement of a berm at the access point. <br />The proposed energy dissipater location at the confluence of a steep gulch with th~=_ top of the east <br />dump was inspected. The location where the gulch intersects the dump had been over e::cavated to expose <br />the underlying soils and bedrock. There was a small flow of water in the excavation. The design of <br />the energy dissipater was discussed. The design will include the installation of s relatively fine <br />grained bedding over the dump rock, installation and anchoring of a geosynthetic clay liner, and <br />