My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC24562
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC24562
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:24:14 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:55:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
1/8/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo C-1981-019 <br />8 January 2007 <br />Pg 2/9 G~ <br />Roads (cont.): -The road to the 101 dragline working in the East Pit area was wet but <br />stable and well maintained at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems <br />were noted on this road. <br />Hydrologic Balance: - In Section 4 of the West Pit, where the highwall miner began <br />operating, there was a very large impoundment of water due to the large amount of <br />precipitation the mine received in the early fall months. This impounded water had <br />completely covered the coal stockpile from the highwall miner at the bottom of the <br />West Pit. The operator estimated that there was up to 14 million gallons of water in <br />the pit. The operator was pumping the water from the pit directly into Taylor Creek <br />under a CDPS Industrial General Minimal Discharge Permit (MINDI Permit). The system <br />pumps water to the top of the pit, into a 20,000 gallon holding tank (to settle out any <br />settlable solids) then through a packed sand filtration system to remove the <br />remaining solids. The water will not flow into the East Taylor Pond prior to being <br />discharged. The discharge pipe has a diffuser and is routed into the riprapped outfall <br />for the East Taylor Pond below the flume to minimize erosion and environmental <br />impact. The MINDI permit was effective for three months and expired on 12 January <br />2007. Colowyo has indicated that they were renewing the permit. The operator <br />submitted Minor Revision 85 to the Division to address this discharge. This revision was <br />approved on 2 November 2006. The operator was pumping at the time of the <br />inspection and the water level has been pumped down approximately 20 feet. The <br />diffuser that is attached to the end of the flex tube is working very well. There is no <br />erosion in the outfall of the East Taylor Pond. See the pictures at the end of this <br />inspection report for views of the impounded water and the diffuser in action. <br />-The Section 16 Pond was inaccessible due to snow at the time of the inspection. <br />- The wash bay pond (not a NPDES discharge point) contained water approximately <br />four feet below the top of the embankment and was not discharging. This is a total <br />containment pond and discharge into the Work Area Pond triggers BTEX testing (in <br />addition to regular NPDES testing). The pond embankment was well vegetated and <br />appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems were <br />noted on the pond embankment at the time of the inspection. <br />-The work area pond (NPDES 002A) contained water approximately three feet below <br />the top of the discharge pipe. The pond embankment was well vegetated and <br />appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. No erosional problems were <br />noted on the embankment at the time of the inspection. <br />-The Gossard Pond (NPDES 003A) contained water approximately three feet below <br />the riser pipe and was not discharging at the time of the inspection. The pond <br />embankment was well vegetated and appeared to be stable at the time of the <br />inspection. No erosional problems noted on the embankment at the time of the <br />inspection. The emergency spillway is a 12" culvert. <br />- All of the roadside ditches appeared to be clean and functioning as designed at <br />the time of the inspections. No erosional problems, sediment build-up or blow-outs <br />were noted at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.