My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC07093
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC07093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:04:11 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:29:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980251
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/13/2006
Doc Name
Unresolved Problems
From
DMG kap
To
Park County Road and Bridge
Inspection Date
9/15/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID r OR PROSPECTING ID #: +~~-tevv-~tAs <br />INSPECTION DATE: 9/t 505 <br />INSPECTOR•SfNITIALS: KAP <br />The following problems (PBJ and/or possible violations (PV) hand suggested corrective actions) were identified <br />during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the dates given, or they will become possible <br />violations. The possible violations should be corrected by the dates given to reduce their severitywhen considered <br />by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. The inspector noteC on the previous page should be notified of all <br />corrective actions taken. <br />PROBLEMS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS <br />AND <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />CORRECTION <br />DATE <br />1~ 11/ 15/OS <br />During the inspection, it was discovered that there were no boundary markers identifying <br />the permit boundary of the site. The is a problem related to Section 3.1.12 f2J of the <br />Construction Materials Rules and Regulations for failure to mark the boundaries of the <br />affected area by monuments or other markers that ore clearly visible and adequate to <br />delineate such boundaries. <br />PB or PV: _P_B-. <br />TOPIC(S): ~M <br />CorrartivP Actinn• Plnce n ropriatP boundsrv_mnrkerc nt the eitP within 3~ dnyc of rPCeioT - - - <br />nf this in,~cnPt~tion raRnrt. nnn cant9 nhnfnc to iha f~ivi<inn fnr varifir^ntinn <br />2. t2/ 15/ QS <br />During the inspection, it was discovered that the slope on the north side of the pit is steeper <br />than the slopes designated in the approved reclamation plan. This is a problem related to <br />Rule 3x32.5-116 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, for failure to perform the prescribed <br />reclamation plan. <br />PB or Pv: ~$_ <br />TOPIC(S): ~z <br />!'nrrPrtiva AnTinn~ Gmria tha nnrfh <In~ of tha ~ to n ~rnrie of ~H~1 V nr IPSC nnr~1 c nd <br />photos of the slope to the Division of Minerals and Geoj4„gv within sixtyj601 davs of rPCeipt of <br />this inspa tiLOn resort <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.