My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-08-05_REVISION - M1986123 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986123
>
2024-08-05_REVISION - M1986123 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 6:59:13 AM
Creation date
8/5/2024 2:26:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986123
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/5/2024
Doc Name
Objection
From
Witwer,Oldenbug,Barry & Groom, LLP
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JPL
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Findings and Resolution <br /> Stroh Pit Special Revie-*c <br /> Page 7 <br /> so additional noise may be perceived as an impact. Applicant updated its professional <br /> noise study in February 2018 to add significantly more detail and acoustical data to the <br /> analysis as well as additional mitigation to insure all noise generated from the mining <br /> operation will be less than 55 dba at any surrounding residential property line. <br /> Applicant's noise engineer testified that in measuring noise to determine that noise <br /> created only by the mining operation, ambient noise is measured and eliminated from the <br /> determination using a scientific calculation. The County Health Department <br /> representative confirmed this. Ambient noise is not added to the noise generated by <br /> applicant in determining whether applicant exceeds the 55 dba limit. Further review of <br /> the application indicated the technical standards required for the approval of this <br /> application and demonstrated that it will not result in a substantial adverse impact. <br /> Applicant stated that it will mitigate noise by designing the site with large setbacks, <br /> installing 10-1-5 foot berms around the pit areas, positioning stockpiles to shield noise, <br /> installing a conveyor system, using white noise backup alarms, and implementing noise <br /> monitoring. <br /> As to concerns about mining near a petroleum pipeline, applicant noted that there <br /> is a steel 8"pipeline that runs north/south and bisects the project. The pipeline has been <br /> an integral part of the engineering planning of the project from the beginning. Applicant <br /> noted it will take great measures to protect the safety of this pipeline, including <br /> construction of soil cement slope stabilization to the adjacent pit slopes to project from <br /> erosion if flooding were to occur. This specification was reviewed and approved by the <br /> Larimer Countv Flood Review Board. Applicant will stake out and not work within the <br /> agreed-upon the 100 foot easement as shown in the site plan. <br /> In further addressing impacts on properties and their values, the Board notes that <br /> the request is a temporary use (7 years) and will, upon completion of mining. result in <br /> lakes/water storage with the potential for enhanced view sheds and wildlife habitat which <br /> may increase property values. Absent the mining operation, a potential, if not likely, use <br /> of this property will be further residential development. The immediate area has been <br /> under development for the past 12 years and will continue to develop for several more. <br /> The impacts from development are noise, dust and heavy truck traffic—i.e.,many of the <br /> same adverse impacts complained about by persons opposing the mine. <br /> e. The recommendations of referral agencies haiv been considered. <br /> Referral agency comments were included in materials appended to the <br /> Development Services Team Staff Report. The need for air and water quality controls, <br /> noise mitigation, safety and integrity of water impoundments, drainage and other issues <br /> have been identified, incorporated in the evaluation of the special review application and <br /> addressed satisfactorily by the applicant. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.