My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022013
>
2023-02-02_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 3:57:19 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 3:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/2/2023
Doc Name Note
Cover Letter
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Raptor Materials LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a schedule that specifies the areas to be reclaimed for given phases, with ranges of <br /> time periods. The phases described in Exhibit E should be coordinated with the <br /> Reclamation Plan Map, Exhibit F. <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Refer back to Item #17: We avoid the use of `Phases' to aid simultaneous <br /> development of Sections within Fields. The rules provide for clarity in Required <br /> Annual Reports and via Revision (Technical Revisions & Amendments). The goal is <br /> to provide flexibility in the document, addressing changes via the Annual Report, <br /> and minimize revisions. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> This item was not sufficiently addressed. Rule 6.4.5 requires details in the <br /> reclamation plan. In the event that an operator wishes to change the plan at a later <br /> date, a technical revision or amendment can be employed. <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> Raptor has revised Exhibit E to provide additional detail including discussion and <br /> Table E-1, Mining-Regrading Schedule (p 9, Footnote 5, p10, Footnote 6). <br /> 30) The discussion on pit slopes (pages 4 - 5) should include a discussion on the <br /> method for grading these slopes, including push distances. Also, the discussion <br /> should include the method for verifying the final slopes and documenting this <br /> information. <br /> Raptor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Final slopes are readily determined using hand-held lasers. Push distances will <br /> vary by finished basin depth but are not anticipated to exceed 200 feet but will <br /> average significantly less than this. A Caterpillar D6 LGP or equivalent will be used <br /> supported by a compactor. Some material may be dumped in by articulated dump <br /> trucks working together with the dozer push and compaction. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> No additional response is required from RM. <br /> 31) The reclamation plan needs to state that all compacted areas will be ripped prior <br /> to addition of topsoil and seed. <br /> 371Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation —Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.