My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-01-04_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022013
>
2023-01-04_PERMIT FILE - M2022013 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2023 8:47:46 PM
Creation date
1/4/2023 7:42:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/4/2023
Doc Name Note
Cover Letter
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Raptor Materials, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
RDZ
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Under Exhibit M is an approved U.S. Army Corps of Engineers report designating <br /> `No Permit Required.' Most of the wetlands as they occur at the Big Thompson <br /> River are predominantly limited to the channel itself. If and when a conveyor is <br /> built upon the projected line, the footings are not expected to exceed the <br /> requirements for a Nationwide Permit, but if they will, a Nationwide Permit will be <br /> applied for and secured prior to affecting such areas. It simply isn't anticipated at <br /> this time. If a Nationwide Permit is necessary, the OMLR will be provided with the <br /> necessary justification or approval under an OMLR Technical Revision to that end. <br /> Please refer to Item #45 for additional clarification. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> RM needs to revise Exhibits 1/J, and re-submit, with the discussion and statement <br /> regarding minimization of impacts. As appropriate, reference other exhibits and <br /> reports from other entitles e.g., the [IS Arm v Corps of Engineers). <br /> Raptor Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> Raptor has revised Exhibit I/J as requested (page 3, Footnote 1). <br /> 50) In the Weed Management Plan, the paragraph that mentions the State of <br /> Colorado noxious weeds list should state that List A species will be eradicated and <br /> List B Species will be controlled. The plan should also describe the efforts that will <br /> be made to control List C species, including field bindweed, a focus in Weld County. <br /> The Division recognizes that mapping and vector identification can be useful tools <br /> for weed control, but these practices should not delay treatment of weeds. <br /> Rotor Materials First Adequacy Response <br /> Weed management will be under the supervision of a certified weed management <br /> specialist. All applicable requirements currently in force at the time will be adhered <br /> to. <br /> Division Second Adequacy Comment <br /> RM did not address the adequacy item. RMneeds to revise Exhibits 1/J, and re- <br /> submit, with the statements regarding listed species. <br /> Raptor.Materials Second Adequacy Response <br /> Raptor have provided additional information in response to this request to the Weed <br /> 511Page <br /> Correspondence to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation—Reply to Rob Zuber,EPS—Adequacy Letters of 24 June and 5 <br /> August 2022;in the matter of the Two Rivers Sand,Gravel and Reservoir Project—M2022-013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.