Laserfiche WebLink
113 <br /> i April project to kind of show the area as we just i A. Yeah. Again, the color coding is the <br /> 2 discussed where it looks like there was a 2 same scale as it was on the previous survey we <br /> 3 significant vertical anomaly in the electrical 3 discussed. As we state earlier, since we're trying <br /> 4 resistivity. 4 to get higher resolutions, we shortened up the <br /> 5 So the second phase was to try to get 5 spacing. Instead of 3-meter spacing between <br /> 6 some more information between those lines and try 6 electrodes, it was a one-and-a-half-meter spacing. <br /> 7 and maybe define that a little better. We shortened 7 What that does -- and obviously in <br /> 8 up on the length of the lines, trying to look at 8 the previous Figure 2 you can see the lines are much <br /> 9 specific depths. 9 shorter. Even though we used the same nurber of <br /> 10 Q. Okay. Why don't you turn to Figure 2 10 electrodes, they're about half the length. <br /> 11 of that report. What does this figure illustrate 11 The other consequence of this is you <br /> 12 with respect to the difference in the two sampling 12 don't see as deep in a section with the shorter <br /> 13 efforts? 13 spacing singly because your depth of exploration is <br /> 14 A. That applies the locations of the 14 a function of your separation of the electrodes. <br /> 15 eight lines that were surveyed in the July field 15 Q. In layman's terms, is that -- what <br /> 16 effort relative to those that were done in the -- 16 does that let you do with respect to examining <br /> 17 excuse me -- the April effort. 17 resistivity within this smaller area? <br /> 18 Q. Which color -- 18 A. Well, what -- you're getting data <br /> 19 A. The blue, and the suffix on them are ii9 points at much higher density, twice the density <br /> 20 SR. SR1 through SR8 are the work done in this 20 that you were before. So you can see lateral <br /> 21 sampling program. The Lls -- L1 through L7 is the 21 changes. You know, you can break those out a little <br /> 22 lines that were done in the previous program, and 22 tighter, theoretically. <br /> 23 there's a color difference, orange against blue. 23 You know, if you're looking at a <br /> 24 Orange for the earlier survey; blue for the present 24 measuring device that's this big (indicated), you <br /> 25 or the latest survey. 25 can only say it's somewhere in here (indicated). If <br /> 113 115 <br /> 1 Q. All right. What was the effect of 1 you're looking at this big (indicated), you can see <br /> 2 the shorter sample survey lines? 2 something in between that. So it allows for a <br /> 3 A. They generally showed the -- similar 3 greater resolution -- excuse me -- lateral <br /> 4 results to what was done in -- in the April survey. 4 resolution with the setup. <br /> 5 This -- at this point the work was a little --much 5 Q. Okay. <br /> 6 drier ground and stuff. So we had to do much more 6 MR. STUTZ: Mr. Chairman, I wonder if <br /> 7 effort to get -- or to get data out of this, we had 7 I could ask for a five-minute natural break? <br /> 8 to add water --more water and stuff to it. And so 8 MR. SINGLETARY: All right. We'll do <br /> 9 the data quality is not quite as good because of the 9 that. <br /> 10 ground. 10 MR. JUSTUS: No objection. <br /> 11 But the general results of the 11 MR. ROBEWS: Reconvene at 10 till. <br /> 12 survey, you know, completed in different -- in 12 (Break fran 2:45 p.m. to 2:53 p.m.) <br /> 13 multiple months shows generally the same 13 MR. SINGLETARY: Okay. We'll <br /> 14 information; that the anomaly is about the same spot 14 reconvene. <br /> 15 on the map, purple. 15 Q. (BY MR. JUSTUS) We'll start again. <br /> 16 Q. kby don't we take a look at Figure 5, i16 Mr. Hild, beginning again with Figure 5 of your last <br /> 17 then? Is this the result of the second sampling 17 report -- or Fugro's last report. Could you tell me <br /> 18 effort? 18 how the results of this effort carpared to the April <br /> 19 A. Yes, it is. 19 survey? <br /> 20 Q. And how was the data processed? 20 A. Yes. Again, it's on a much more <br /> 21 A. The same manner that was described 21 cccrpressed area we're looking at. It does show <br /> 22 for you earlier. 22 similar results, particularly in the -- if you look <br /> 23 Q. Okay. And can you walk us through 23 at 4 and 5 where you do have vertical or <br /> 24 these results and what resistivity conclusions you 24 semi-vertical anamalies -- low resistivity anomalies <br /> 25 were able to make? 25 in there. That's the main thing. Again, we are not <br /> 114 116 <br />