2017-05-24_REVISION - C1981041 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

117 1 looking as deep in this one as we did in the 1 A. So, again, we identified the area of 2 previous report. 2 vertical ananaly, which again we're trying to group 3 Q. Okay. 3 together the lower resistivity anoralies because we 4 A. Stuff off to the south looks very 4 think those probably have a greater bearing on stuff 5 similar to it, where you've got a resistive layer 15 that are water-containing -- units that contain 6 kind of runs out to the north and is very similar to I 6 water. 7 the previous one. 7 They should lager the resistivity -- 8 Q. Okay. And haw about to the north? 8 the bulk resistivity on that unit. There are 9 A. To the north, again, it's fairly 9 several mechanisms that that occurs. So we try to 10 consistent. We do have what we call a NS, 10 identify those. And I've got them outlined -- 11 near-surface, anomaly coming through, which is a 1 11 excuse me -- as dashed black lines on the cross 12 later resistivity layer or unit within there, which 12 section of Figure 5, and then I translate those 13 again is indicative of changes of what we think are 13 areas over. 14 different than what you see in the south. But there 14 So the ERT anomaly boundary from both 15 are -- this lower resistivity unit, but it's more in 15 units, and then what we call the near-surface 16 the center of the set of lines. 16 anomaly, which are those blue units. There's a 17 Q. Okay. And where -- I see you 17 north one, and then there's the -- just a standard 18 described an NSA and a north NSA. Were those 18 near-surface ananaly. 19 revealed in the April survey? 19 Q. Where does the first one originate, 20 A. Yes. I think -- I'll look real 20 the NSA? 21 quick. There is suggestions of them, although I 21 A. It originates along SR1 near the -- 22 don't think I outlined then as strongly as I did 22 excuse me -- the ditch. 23 here. 23 Q. Okay. 24 Q. Okay. To define your granularity of 24 A. SR1 intersects the ditch. 25 this survey, was that able to help bring them out, 25 Q. Is there any other physical 117 119 1 or was that something you missed the first time? 1 characteristics about that location identified in 2 A. It could have been -- I mean, I think 2 Figure 2? 3 it's probably a little -- these are smaller units. 3 A. The sinkholes that are at that point. 4 I think it's -- probably additional data helped. 4 Q. Okay. And does the near-surface 5 There is sane suggestion of the lower resistivity j 5 anomaly track towards the air shaft location that 6 zones in there. 6 you've been given? 7 Q. Okay. 7 A. Yes, it does. 8 A. In the earlier survey, the 8 MR. JUSTUS: All right. I've got 9 near-surface. You can see. 9 nothing more. I'm going to move to admit Exhibits 10 Q. Okay. Would you describe for the 10 A-29 and A-32. 11 Board where you might see those? 11 MR. BECI(FTTH: No objection. 12 A. On the previous survey? 12 MR. SINGLEPARY: No objections? 13 Q. In the previous survey. Exhibit 29, 13 MR. STUTZ: No objections. 14 Figure 5, in that survey. 14 MR. SCHUTLZ: No objections. 15 A. Yeah. In the -- you see generally in 15 MR. ROBERTS: Mr. Justus, at the end 16 the lines -- particularly line 4, and close -- 5 and 16 of your presentation, would you mind listing for me 17 a little further north of line 5 where there are 17 all of the exhibits that you wish to or that you 18 blue units in there in the near surface. 18 have offered into evidence? I just want to make 19 Q. Okay. How did you translate what 19 sure I have it. 20 you've identified out of Figure 5 into Figure 2? j20 MR. JUSTUS: Okay. I'm trying to do 21 A. Are you talking the -- 21 it sinnultaneously, but I will give that to you. 22 Q. In Exhibit 32. I apologize. In the 22 MR. ROBERTS: And we can do it all at 23 latter survey. 23 the end. That's fine. 24 A. In the latter survey? 24 MR. JUSTUS: Okay. 25 Q. Yes. 25 MR. BECWITH: Before I start, 118 120